On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 16:03:29 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
Hyped by ProtoObject, this is our hope for a nothrow @nogc
.destroy eventually!
This fails today only because of the rt_finalize hook working
through void*. If you cut that out...
---
class Foo {
~this() @nogc
On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 12:47:11 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Five projects have been selected for SAOC 2021. I've summarized
them on the blog.
I would like to point out that the quality of the applications
this year was top-notch. Thanks to the applicants for putting
in the effort. I hope
On 8/30/21 8:47 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
Five projects have been selected for SAOC 2021. I've summarized them on
the blog.
I would like to point out that the quality of the applications this year
was top-notch. Thanks to the applicants for putting in the effort. I
hope they all put the same
On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 13:26:09 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
[snip]
Why wasn't fixing the linking bugs considered an alternative to
forking std.complex?
What are the other remaining reasons for not using std.complex?
It doesn't look like any bug reports were filed. Hopefully that
can
On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 17:02:33 UTC, 9il wrote:
There are few reasons. The main one is that linking bugs caused
by a compiler mangling/generation bugs makes std.complex
unusable for us. Initially I have updated all packages with
std.complex, however it failed to link in a private
On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 12:47:11 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Five projects have been selected for SAOC 2021. I've summarized
them on the blog.
[snip]
Looks like a good set of projects. Good luck to them.
Five projects have been selected for SAOC 2021. I've summarized
them on the blog.
I would like to point out that the quality of the applications
this year was top-notch. Thanks to the applicants for putting in
the effort. I hope they all put the same effort into their weekly
forum updates
