On Sunday, 8 January 2023 at 03:58:43 UTC, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
On Sunday, 8 January 2023 at 03:18:27 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
On Sunday, 8 January 2023 at 02:15:27 UTC, areYouSureAboutThat
wrote:
C is not just a programming language anymore. It's a complete
(and very diverse) ecosystem.
No
On Sunday, 8 January 2023 at 03:18:27 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
On Sunday, 8 January 2023 at 02:15:27 UTC, areYouSureAboutThat
wrote:
C is not just a programming language anymore. It's a complete
(and very diverse) ecosystem.
No progress has been made for decades but that doesn't mean
progress
On Sunday, 8 January 2023 at 02:15:27 UTC, areYouSureAboutThat
wrote:
C is not just a programming language anymore. It's a complete
(and very diverse) ecosystem.
No progress has been made for decades but that doesn't mean
progress is impossible. Maybe the academia will take note that
On Saturday, 7 January 2023 at 23:27:02 UTC, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
There are attempts to rewrite it in safer programming languages
;-) Such as https://github.com/Byron/gitoxide
I'd love to hear Lord Linus's thought on this.
Let's see if the alternative implementations turn out to be
On Saturday, 7 January 2023 at 22:25:30 UTC, areYouSureAboutThat
wrote:
Well, the worlds most widely used source code revision control
system, is written in C ;-)
There are attempts to rewrite it in safer programming languages
;-) Such as https://github.com/Byron/gitoxide
Let's see if the
On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 11:02:03 UTC, Tejas wrote:
Those statements, even if spoken recently, are just a way of
maintaining PR. Elon also similarly calls C++ a bloated mess
and that all high performance code at Tesla is in C, as if
that's something to be proud of... their ultra safety
On Thursday, 5 January 2023 at 20:24:07 UTC, Alexandru Militaru
wrote:
Hi everyone,
If you remember the "D for a @safer Linux Kernel“ talk from
DConf 2019 [1], then you might want to read our paper [2] on
that matter that was just published in IEEE Access Journal.
[1]
On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 12:52:43 UTC, Hipreme wrote:
Hello people. I have tried working again with adam's wasm
minimal runtime, and yesterday I was able to make a great
progress on it.
Awesome! To think that custom druntime can get you out of
platform situations is great risk
