Re: Descent 0.5.4 released

2009-02-01 Thread BCS
Hello Ary, BCS escribió: For me an the other 0.25 shlups out there that are trying to run descent without an internet connection, is there a zipfile download for 0.5.4? Here's a temporary one: http://downloads.dsource.org/projects/descent/descent_0.5.4.20090131.z ip But... you'll need

DMD-MAC!!

2009-01-28 Thread BCS
http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=1015Itemid=

Re: Descent 0.5.4 released

2009-01-27 Thread BCS
Reply to Ary, Ary Borenszweig wrote: The Descent plugin for Eclipse provides an IDE for writing, launching and debugging code in D. Explanations on how to get it from within Eclipse are here: http://www.dsource.org/projects/descent New features: - Compile-time view (Window - Show View -

Re: Descent 0.5.3 released

2009-01-20 Thread BCS
Reply to Robert, That doesn't look entirely useless, especially for optimization. Perhaps hard to read, but easier than reading the assembly output ;-P! ditto; now that you have it might as well make it available.

Re: DMD 1.039 and 2.023 releases

2009-01-07 Thread BCS
Reply to Brad, Restating in the form of a question... When would you _ever_ want {...} to not form a scope? static if(foo) { int i; float x; }

TPCI: ho hum

2009-01-04 Thread BCS
Anyone remember D's rank last month? IIRC it was 13 and in that case we (again) managed to gain a position with a drop in percentage :b http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/paperinfo/tpci/D.html

Re: Descent 0.5.3 released

2008-12-20 Thread BCS
Reply to Ary, And a question: what would you like to see next in Descent? Better template support. I now have 2 libs that are just flat uneditable under descent (scrapple.units and scrapple.dparse) both bring it down to a stand still if not crash and hand it out right. I'd love to see it

Re: New DigitalMars D newsgroups/forum

2008-12-16 Thread BCS
Reply to Denis, I have been working on new newsgroups archive last few days. This is an newsgroup posts archive structured in a way so that it feels more like a forum (that's what you demanded, right?). COOL I hit this page: http://dnews.naxx.ru/topic.php?id=117556 and it started trying

Re: NP=P

2008-12-13 Thread BCS
Reply to Knud, Læs lige denne artikel http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.1385 If I'm reading that correctly, not exactly, the verbiage seems to imply that they didn't solve P=NP but a related problem. ... these problems most of which are not believed to have even a polynomial time sequential

Re: NWCPP january talk

2008-12-11 Thread BCS
Reply to Walter, Bartosz has signed me up to give a presentation at the January meeting of the NWCPP. http://www.nwcpp.org/ I am not sure what to talk about, though. Any particular D topics you'd find particularly interesting? Hard core compile time reflection a.k.a D'iss'ection I'm

Re: I'm off to Oredev, be back in a few days

2008-11-21 Thread BCS
Reply to 0ffh, Walter Bright wrote: All the Swedes I encountered were very friendly [...] In contrast, I've been to other countries where they clearly disliked americans on sight, their only interest was in shaking you down for as much money as possible, and sniggering about you when you turn

DDBI update

2008-10-29 Thread BCS
Yesterday, larsivi committed an update to DDBI. It's the first work in a month or so. http://www.dsource.org/projects/ddbi/changeset/95 Initial commit for the next phase of DDBI development (I am really sorry that it has taken this long). * First revision of the new base interfaces (in

Re: Statistics library

2008-10-26 Thread BCS
Reply to dsimcha, Yes, I realize that it's best to do things like this off the newsgroup, but your email address doesn't seem to work. Sorry. I figure I get enough SPAM as it is. Besides, there are about 2 dozen other ways to get it if you are persistent enough Oh. Your in, have fun (I

Re: DMD 1.036 and 2.020 releases

2008-10-21 Thread BCS
Reply to dsimcha, == Quote from John Reimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])'s article Hello Andrei, I think the entire operator paraphernalia is due for a serious overhaul. Andrei This may not be a popular opinion, but I agree! -JJR I'll second that. D's operator overloading is a bit confusing

<    1   2