Re: Learning With D

2011-05-22 Thread Emil Madsen
On 22 May 2011 22:26, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote: Jesse Phillips: We all know D would make a very good first language, and I want to provide some material that makes this possible. This is a very interesting experiment, thank you for writing it. Regarding languages to be

Re: D Article Contest - win an iPad2

2011-03-30 Thread Emil Madsen
On 30 March 2011 07:40, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote: D Article Contest! First Prize: iPad 2 wifi 16Gb Write an article about the D programming language. The articles submitted will be voted on by the participants in the digitalmars.D newsgroup. Vote tallies determine the

Re: QtD is suspended

2010-09-27 Thread Emil Madsen
Is there a partly complete release? - that just basic stuff available? On 26 September 2010 19:04, Max Samukha spam...@d-coding.com wrote: On 09/26/2010 05:36 PM, Emil Madsen wrote: Just curious about QtD, how far did the design process go in terms of % before it got suspended? 10% - 25

Re: the bit[] type

2010-09-24 Thread Emil Madsen
Now I'm just curious, how does D represent a bool type as false and true, I take it that false is 0b, is true anything but that? - or will the compiler make sure, that its always 0b or would it be 0b0001? (as 0b would be -1 if signed) - is there a given standard for

Re: the bit[] type

2010-09-24 Thread Emil Madsen
Just because my last message, wasn't long enough I wanted to add more: The real issue for me, is that the debate about bool and bit, has been about if one of the other should be implemented, thats not the debate for me, as I really do think, these types are quite different, even tho they

the bit[] type

2010-09-22 Thread Emil Madsen
Okay I'm interresting in getting more infomation about the bit[] type; - is it still implemented in D1? - and why was it removed? - is it possible to get a link to the design considerations of removing it, and such? - any source of info, on the design phase about it, will be in my interrest --

Re: the bit[] type

2010-09-22 Thread Emil Madsen
...@lycos.com wrote: Emil Madsen: Okay I'm interresting in getting more infomation about the bit[] type; - is it still implemented in D1? - and why was it removed? - is it possible to get a link to the design considerations of removing it, and such? - any source of info, on the design

Re: Sept. 15 - The Many Faces of D

2010-09-07 Thread Emil Madsen
Would love to see it :) However for at student in europe, its quite far. Hoping for availablity of it, on youtube :) On 7 September 2010 20:16, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote: Mike James wrote: For those of us on different continents - will it be available on youtube :-) I