On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 16:54:36 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
"“But D has a GC!”, I hear you exclaim.
No body said that. Funny how you chose the simplest argument to
argue against.
Yes, but it’s also a
systems programming language with value types and pointers,
meaning that today, D
On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 04:53:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 04:20:19 UTC, Exil wrote:
it's a bad idea. Why have two community reviews? Those are
made with the assumption that the DIP will actually change
between the reviews.
No, that's not the
On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 04:49:52 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 04:20:19 UTC, Exil wrote:
Should create a DIPW process then, duck the foundation and any
formalities. Which stands for DIPWalter, which simply consists
of a single step where a single topic
On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 15:10:23 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 04:20:19 UTC, Exil wrote:
Not to mention the problem is actually solved just by using
the GC.
The d language is marked as a system programming language. The
GC is not going to cut it to a lot
On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 00:03:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, October 21, 2019 6:59:21 AM MDT Exil via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> This proposal is one step toward a larger goal outlined in
> the
>
> blog post ['Ownership and Borrowing in
> D'](https:/
This proposal is one step toward a larger goal outlined in the
blog post ['Ownership and Borrowing in
D'](https://dlang.org/blog/2019/07/15/ownership-and-borrowing-in-d/).
That's the only line that was added, no other changes were made
to the core DIP from the first revision to the last. Big
Is the source available anywhere? Would be interesting to look
through unless this is close source?
On Sunday, 12 May 2019 at 10:58:49 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Bringing it up over and over again, like a perennial fight in a
marriage, with the hope of finally convincing the spouse on the
wrongness of their views - that all is wasted time.
There's a bunch of big rocks to move.
I take
On Saturday, 11 May 2019 at 07:53:36 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Anyone interested in the AGM can watch it at the following
link. You can leave feedback there, in IRC, or in Discord.
https://youtu.be/cpTAtiboIDs
Regarding the discussion of how bool is handled...
It's a one bit integer so it
