Good job. Compiles and passess all of the unittests of Tango-D2.
I'm extra glad that you fixed the installation instructions
too... the old ones were horrible.
-SiegeLord
-persist string for
the process.
Thanks for figuring it out and testing!
-SiegeLord
:
https://github.com/SiegeLord/DGnuplot/blob/master/example.d
One unique feature that comes for free by virtue of using an
external plotting program is that you don't have to plot things
right away, but instead save the commands to a file and plot them
at a different time (by piping them
On Sunday, 11 March 2012 at 21:45:02 UTC, SiegeLord wrote:
I have been using a GNUPlot controller for my scientific work
with D for some time now, so I just wanted to announce that
such a thing exists if anybody is interested in using it or
whatnot. It supports very some basic features (hence
.
-SiegeLord
to work just as well
as the original in my limited tests). You can find the repository
here:
https://github.com/SiegeLord/xfbuild
-SiegeLord
talked to the developers about making this an official port
or anything like that. I plan to in the future.
-SiegeLord
I can learn enough of
it to fix it (or someone can step up, it probably works now thanks to your
efforts). I know enough Makefile to fix that up too if needed.
-SiegeLord
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
Please please PLEASE, no makefiles. I just hate them.
Just to clarify, the bobs are not going anywhere. The Makefile will be just for
the people that want to use it.
-SiegeLord
--
/Jacob Carlborg
is significantly slower than
the original Tango.
-SiegeLord
Nick
/SiegeLord/Tango-D2
FAQ
Does it work alongside Phobos/does it use druntime?
Yes and yes.
Why are you doing this?
Because I want to.
That's all,
-SiegeLord
would take care of it for Fedora once the
port was complete) so at least it won't be as big of a deal there.
-SiegeLord
Caligo Wrote:
Why? What's the point? Why not work on Phobos instead?
Aside from the obvious philosophical differences, which I am NOT going to get
into, porting D1 projects is an important reason.
-SiegeLord
examples of this, what's changed?
The biggest difference right now is the near-complete rewriting of the
tango.net package. You'd have to get a hold of mtachrono to see what roadmap he
has.
-SiegeLord
Trass3r Wrote:
Why isn't it the other way around?
Just a historical oddity.
-SiegeLord
party
library you can use alongside Phobos. Think using libGTK along side glibc.
1, 3. Subjective. I think the opposite and more importantly I believe in choice.
2. Fixed 3 months ago.
-SiegeLord
OR use a tool like xfbuild
(maybe rdmd too, never had luck with that one) to compile only the modules that
your program imports.
-SiegeLord
/SiegeLord/Tango-D2
We are currently a little more than half way done in terms of modules fiddled
with. Currently there are 181 modules ported out of approximately 343 (give or
take 20). Currently only the dmd compiler and Linux platform are supported...
but obviously we want to get all the other
Does it work with Tango or will that need to be patched?
-SiegeLord
19 matches
Mail list logo
