Re: Project Highlight: Voxelman

2016-12-31 Thread jkpl via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 13:27:13 UTC, MrSmith wrote: On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 11:48:34 UTC, jkpl wrote: I don't blame your personally but the last time a blog post presented a game (it was the one made by the author of dlib) there was also a similar problem. Were you aware

Re: Project Highlight: Voxelman

2016-12-31 Thread jkpl via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 13:42:10 UTC, MrSmith wrote: On Friday, 30 December 2016 at 13:28:12 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Voxelman is a plugin-driven voxel game engine that is built around a client-server architecture and sports multi-threaded world & mesh generation. I stumbled across a

Re: D support for the Meson build system

2016-08-22 Thread jkpl via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 11:45:37 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 01:34:36 UTC, jkpl wrote: On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 19:08:59 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: for a project like Terminix, dub with LDC builds in 8.6s, while Meson and ninja take only 6s here. Did

Re: D support for the Meson build system

2016-08-21 Thread jkpl via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 19:08:59 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: for a project like Terminix, dub with LDC builds in 8.6s, while Meson and ninja take only 6s here. Did you try to build with DUB but with WIFI or ethernet interface toggled off ?

Re: D popularity clearly on the rise in early 2016?!

2016-02-06 Thread jkpl via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 6 February 2016 at 12:26:28 UTC, Rom wrote: Hi guys. I watch this index each month, and D moved 20 places up between January and February. it's now in the supposedly "top 20 most popular programming languages". I don't know yet whether this is due to some artefacts or if it

Re: Coedit 1 - update 1

2015-06-25 Thread jkpl via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 11:34:17 UTC, tired_eyes wrote: On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 04:10:15 UTC, Basile Burg wrote: This is the first update for Coedit 1, and probably the only. Errr... why so pessimistic? It's not pessimistic, it's the opposite. This explained by the software