On Tuesday, 25 February 2020 at 13:39:40 UTC, Aliak wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 February 2020 at 13:04:41 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 February 2020 at 09:36:25 UTC, aliak wrote:
[...]
Yes, that is the key impetus of our amendment, which I also
wrote up on a gist weeks ago.... and it is now on github too!
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/186
[...]
I should’ve been more specific 😬 I was wondering if the same
could be achieved without a introducing a new aggregate type!
In my opinion the only really viable solutions are either to
lower to a function call to format (or similar) such that
typeof(i"") == string or a new type such as Adam describes so
that functions can add overloads for it (and specialized compiler
errors for common misuse cases).
Anything else and you risk users running into inexplicable errors
because their string isn't a string.
