Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-20 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 10/17/2015 09:05 PM, Marco Leise wrote: > Oh wait, false alert. That was a relic from older days. My > build script placed a dummy dmd.conf there. > > I do seem to get problems with ldc2-0.16.0: Are you using something befor 0.16.0-beta2, b/c I thought the problem was resolved.

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-20 Thread Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d-announce
Am Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:26:13 +0200 schrieb Martin Nowak : > On 10/17/2015 09:05 PM, Marco Leise wrote: > > Oh wait, false alert. That was a relic from older days. My > > build script placed a dummy dmd.conf there. > > > > I do seem to get problems with ldc2-0.16.0:

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-17 Thread Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d-announce
Oh wait, false alert. That was a relic from older days. My build script placed a dummy dmd.conf there. I do seem to get problems with ldc2-0.16.0: make -C druntime -f posix.mak MODEL=32 ../dmd/src/dmd -conf= -c -o- -Isrc -Iimport -Hfimport/core/sync/barrier.di src/core/sync/barrier.d

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-17 Thread extrawurst via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 17 October 2015 at 08:13:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Friday, 16 October 2015 at 12:14:09 UTC, ponce wrote: What changed in the backend? http://dlang.org/changelog/2.069.0.html#backend-improvements Is that limited to "-release" builds ?

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-17 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 16 October 2015 at 12:14:09 UTC, ponce wrote: What changed in the backend? http://dlang.org/changelog/2.069.0.html#backend-improvements

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-17 Thread Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d-announce
Am Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:52:57 +0200 schrieb Martin Nowak : > Second beta for the 2.069.0 release. > > http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta > http://dlang.org/changelog/2.069.0.html > > Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org > > -Martin When I use a

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-16 Thread ponce via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 13:53:17 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Second beta for the 2.069.0 release. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.069.0.html Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -Martin Apart from

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-15 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 10/15/15 10:51 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote: On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 05:47:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Brian, should we add you? LMK. -- Andrei indeed! Dunn. -- Andrei

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-15 Thread Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 2015-10-14 20:32, John Colvin wrote: got through to homebrew a faster this time. brew reinstall dmd --devel It's always available through DVM 1 second after announcement :) -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-15 Thread Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 10:33:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 10/15/15 10:51 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote: On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 05:47:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Brian, should we add you? LMK. -- Andrei indeed! Dunn. -- Andrei nice

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-15 Thread Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 05:47:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Brian, should we add you? LMK. -- Andrei indeed!

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-14 Thread Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 13:53:17 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Second beta for the 2.069.0 release. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.069.0.html Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -Martin Is there any reason that these fixes won't be

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-14 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 10/14/2015 08:09 PM, Brian Schott wrote: > > Is there any reason that these fixes won't be merged for 2.069? Please target the stable branch when fixing something. Also tagging as 2.069 milestone helps (can you actually tag that yourself?). I don't examine PRs before branching or tagging a

Re: Beta D 2.069.0-b2

2015-10-14 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 10/15/15 3:05 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 23:44:34 UTC, Brian Schott wrote: On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 23:26:12 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Also tagging as 2.069 milestone helps (can you actually tag that yourself?). No. I would if I could. This one