I forgot to include VERSION in the zip file. Its contents are:
2.062
all on one line. I'll fix the packages.
has this been done? it still seems the zip file doesn't contain
it.
And what about druntime.lib. Is it there?
Or is it not needed?
Dňa 27. 2. 2013 9:08 timotheecour wrote / napísal(a):
I forgot to include VERSION in the zip file. Its contents are:
2.062
all on one line. I'll fix the packages.
has this been done? it still seems the zip file doesn't contain
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 09:30:24 Lubos Pintes wrote:
And what about druntime.lib. Is it there?
Or is it not needed?
druntime is linked in as part of Phobos, so all you need is phobos.lib. It
hasn't been packaged as a separate library for quite a while now.
- Jonathan M Davis
On 2/19/13 6:01 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/18/2013 11:17 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-02-18 21:58, Walter Bright wrote:
I forgot to include VERSION in the zip file. Its contents are:
2.062
all on one line. I'll fix the packages.
Do you have an automated script for packing up the
On Wednesday, 20 February 2013 at 06:39:12 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 02/19/2013 09:57 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
Each developer who works on bugs and enhancements for a given
release
can keep a private journal, some small text file somewhere.
+1
Although, I have seen this done in Bugzilla
On 2/18/13, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
The dlang changelog lists the release date as Jan 4, 2013, this is wrong.
http://dlang.org/changelog.html#new2_062
On 2/18/13, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
This D script dumps all fixed bugs between 2 dates as DDOC entries.
https://gist.github.com/blackwhale/3734045
(or just starting from one date till today).
That being said I've brought it up like 5 times already.
Must be not what you
19-Feb-2013 20:30, Andrej Mitrovic пишет:
On 2/18/13, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
This D script dumps all fixed bugs between 2 dates as DDOC entries.
https://gist.github.com/blackwhale/3734045
(or just starting from one date till today).
That being said I've brought it up
19-Feb-2013 21:00, Dmitry Olshansky пишет:
19-Feb-2013 20:30, Andrej Mitrovic пишет:
On 2/18/13, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
This D script dumps all fixed bugs between 2 dates as DDOC entries.
https://gist.github.com/blackwhale/3734045
(or just starting from one date till
On 2/18/2013 11:17 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-02-18 21:58, Walter Bright wrote:
I forgot to include VERSION in the zip file. Its contents are:
2.062
all on one line. I'll fix the packages.
Do you have an automated script for packing up the zip file? If not, this is the
time to
On 2/19/2013 8:10 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 2/18/13, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
The dlang changelog lists the release date as Jan 4, 2013, this is wrong.
http://dlang.org/changelog.html#new2_062
On 2013-02-19 22:01, Walter Bright wrote:
Yes, I do use a script. The script has to copy all the correct files
over to the right place. VERSION is a new file in a new place, and the
script needed updating to copy that one.
Automation is great, and I use it. But files appear, disappear, and
Yes, that's because the web site was pushed from master rather
than the 2.062 branch.
http://dlang.org/phobos/index.html#std
Duplicates:
std: Core library modules
std.base64 Functions that operate on ASCII characters.
std.base64 Encode/decode base64 format.
On 2/19/13, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see now there's a d.chm file in \bin.
Walter that .chm file you're distributing in Windows\bin is v2.058
(judging by the changelog), or some other version, but it definitely
isn't the latest because documentation is missing
On 2/19/2013 8:29 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 2/19/13, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see now there's a d.chm file in \bin.
Walter that .chm file you're distributing in Windows\bin is v2.058
(judging by the changelog), or some other version, but it definitely
isn't
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:31:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
But I just want to throw in my 2 cents about the new changelog
format. It's impossible now to tell at a glance what the major
changes/fixes are. Clicking through four links to find them is
bad enough, but the layout and color
On 02/19/2013 09:57 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
Each developer who works on bugs and enhancements for a given release
can keep a private journal, some small text file somewhere.
+1
Although, I have seen this done in Bugzilla itself: Every bug has a
field that contains what goes into the
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 07:09:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/17/2013 10:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I'm happy that http://dlang.org/changelog.html; no longer
shows a link
for a yet-to-be-released version of DMD (no sarcasm intended),
but the
release date listed for 2.062 is wrong.
On 2013-02-18 08:31, Walter Bright wrote:
As long as it isn't written in Ruby :-)
I was not referring to what's usually called a scripting language. I
was referring to a script, regardless of language.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 07:31:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
As long as it isn't written in Ruby :-)
But more seriously, a D tool to do it might be interesting.
Here is a simpleton hack:
### RUBY
require nokogiri
require open-uri
# provided the urls are given
changes_new_features_url =
Steven Schveighoffer, el 17 de February a las 22:36 me escribiste:
Also, anyone can go in and change the bugzilla issue titles to
make them more readable.
That actually is not a good thing... Anyone can maliciously affect
the changlog, or alter the changelog at some later point because
On 2013-02-18 10:02, Joshua Niehus wrote:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 07:31:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
As long as it isn't written in Ruby :-)
But more seriously, a D tool to do it might be interesting.
Here is a simpleton hack:
### RUBY
require nokogiri
require open-uri
# provided
18-Feb-2013 11:31, Walter Bright пишет:
On 2/17/2013 11:23 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-02-18 07:31, Walter Bright wrote:
Since I (and Jonathan) wrote the changelog, I can attest that I cut
pasted it character for character out of the bugzilla titles, and
received no comments or
Walter Bright, el 17 de February a las 19:54 me escribiste:
If someone wants to step up and take charge of doing a better job
with the changelog, I'm all for it. The old way was NOT a better
job. It was usually left to me (and Jonathan) to try to cobble
something together. When I was the only
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:55:39 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:07:58 UTC, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
Again, the problem is making the changelog update optional! No
pull
request should be merged if it doesn't include a proper
changelog entry,
that's how
Am Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:05:10 +0100
schrieb Leandro Lucarella l...@llucax.com.ar:
Steven Schveighoffer, el 17 de February a las 22:36 me escribiste:
Also, anyone can go in and change the bugzilla issue titles to
make them more readable.
That actually is not a good thing... Anyone can
Am Mon, 18 Feb 2013 03:10:27 +0100
schrieb Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com:
For the next release I propose that we get more involved in the
release process:
- We make an agreement on when exactly a release is made, without
wondering when Walter might end up doing it himself.
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:55:39 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:07:58 UTC, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
Again, the problem is making the changelog update optional! No
pull
request should be merged if it doesn't include a proper
changelog entry,
that's how
dlangspec v2.062 in several formats:
dlangspec.chm http://d-packages.googlecode.com/files/dlangspec.chm
dlangspec.epub http://d-packages.googlecode.com/files/dlangspec.epub
dlangspec.mobi http://d-packages.googlecode.com/files/dlangspec.mobi
dlangspec.pdf
David Nadlinger, el 18 de February a las 11:55 me escribiste:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:07:58 UTC, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
Again, the problem is making the changelog update optional! No
pull
request should be merged if it doesn't include a proper changelog
entry,
that's how it's
Steven Schveighoffer, el 18 de February a las 00:37 me escribiste:
I propose that when you post the beta on the mailing list, you also
post the reports of the fixed bugs and enhancements. Then people
can edit the descriptions before the release. Then I think after
the release, the
18-Feb-2013 17:22, Leandro Lucarella пишет:
I also would love to see an automatically generated changelog
similar to the original based on the bugzilla data. Can we add a
changelog description field to bug reports so if the bug
description (which arguably shouldn't be changed) isn't a very good
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:31:47 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 10:18 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Compare the earlier changelogs with the bugzilla entries.
18-Feb-2013 13:18, Dmitry Olshansky пишет:
18-Feb-2013 11:31, Walter Bright пишет:
On 2/17/2013 11:23 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-02-18 07:31, Walter Bright wrote:
Since I (and Jonathan) wrote the changelog, I can attest that I cut
pasted it character for character out of the bugzilla
Must be a problem with mobile Chrome then. Probably not specific to the new
change log handling. In chrome that entire content pane has a tendency to
disappear.
--bb
Sent from my Android.
On Feb 17, 2013 11:20 PM, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
On 2/17/2013 5:40 PM, Bill Baxter
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:02:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are
there.
Has anyone even tested the release package? I get
make: *** No rule to make target `../VERSION', needed by
Am Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:02:20 -0800
schrieb Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
I didn't read the whole thread now. Just reporting that
the .zip package cannot be compiled due to
On Monday, February 18, 2013 18:43:37 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
18-Feb-2013 17:22, Leandro Lucarella пишет:
I also would love to see an automatically generated changelog
similar to the original based on the bugzilla data. Can we add a
changelog description field to bug reports so if the bug
On 2/18/2013 8:47 AM, Bill Baxter wrote:
Must be a problem with mobile Chrome then. Probably not specific to the new
change log handling. In chrome that entire content pane has a tendency to
disappear.
I'm still not sure if you're referring to the changelog.html page or the
bugzilla page.
On 2/18/2013 9:02 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:02:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
Has anyone even tested the release package? I get
make: *** No
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:31:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:02:43 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I've lost the motivation to even look at the changelog now.
+1
On 2/18/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I agree we need to improve on this. One way to achieve that, seeing as
marketing is not Walter's focus, is to denote a release czar who has
that particular task around releases. Andrej, would you want to try that
role?
How
On 2/19/13, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote:
How about writing one for 2.062 that can be inserted into the change log
instead of the current links rather than a mockup that might represent
what a change log might look like?
Yes. I'll get to it and make a pull request once it's ready.
On 2/19/13, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/18/13, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
Argh the chm generation is awful now.
I mean when I try to generate the .chm file myself. I can see now
there's a d.chm file in
On 2/19/13, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Error while processing file: .\spec.html
object.Error: Access Violation
I've filed it: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9533
On 2/18/2013 1:18 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
This D script dumps all fixed bugs between 2 dates as DDOC entries.
https://gist.github.com/blackwhale/3734045
(or just starting from one date till today).
That being said I've brought it up like 5 times already.
Must be not what you are looking
On 2/18/2013 6:46 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:31:47 -0500, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
On 2/17/2013 10:18 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Compare the
Personally, I just wish there was a quick blurb at the top of the
changelog indicating the highlights of this release. For example,
with 2.058, the very first two lines of the changelog were:
Add new = lambda syntax.
Allow 1.userproperty syntax. NOTE: 1.f is no longer a float
literal, add a 0.
On 2013-02-19 07:25, Kapps wrote:
Personally, I just wish there was a quick blurb at the top of the
changelog indicating the highlights of this release. For example, with
2.058, the very first two lines of the changelog were:
Add new = lambda syntax.
Allow 1.userproperty syntax. NOTE: 1.f is no
On 2/17/2013 5:07 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 2/18/13, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
The zip download is broken:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:02:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are
there.
Love the new release! Thanks to everyone who contributed. But I
just want to throw in my 2 cents about the new
The new change log also seems inaccessible from mobile. (At least it seems
to freak out chrome on android).
--bb
Sent from my Android.
On Feb 17, 2013 5:25 PM, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 5:07 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 2/18/13, Walter Bright
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:31:45 -0500, Mike Parker aldac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:02:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
Love the new release! Thanks to everyone who
On 2/17/2013 5:31 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
Love the new release! Thanks to everyone who contributed. But I just want to
throw in my 2 cents about the new changelog format. It's impossible now to tell
at a glance what the major changes/fixes are.
It wasn't before, either. It was a list sorted by
On 2/17/2013 5:40 PM, Bill Baxter wrote:
The new change log also seems inaccessible from mobile. (At least it seems to
freak out chrome on android).
The changelog.html uses the same template as the rest of the dconf.org site.
On 2/18/13, Mike Parker aldac...@gmail.com wrote:
But I just want to throw in my 2 cents about the new changelog format.
Not just the changelog, but this release announcement too. Two
sentences, without any information about what is being released, who
is involved, and a short few sentences on
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:55:21 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 5:31 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
Love the new release! Thanks to everyone who contributed. But I just
want to
throw in my 2 cents about the new changelog format. It's impossible now
to tell
at a
Walter Bright:
I'm sorry, I'm baffled at this.
I too prefer the precedent style of the changelog.
Sometimes the reality is more complex than the frame you try to
shove it in :-) Reality of human brains is complex.
Bye,
bearophile
Walter Bright:
I'm sorry, I'm baffled at this.
I read bugzilla entries all day long, but I think as a release
page information that page gives too much information (the Sev
Pri OS Assignee Status Resolution columns) that's just
distracting noise. Sometimes giving less is more.
Bye,
On 2/17/13 9:10 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 2/18/13, Mike Parkeraldac...@gmail.com wrote:
But I just want to throw in my 2 cents about the new changelog format.
Not just the changelog, but this release announcement too. Two
sentences, without any information about what is being released,
On 2/17/13 8:02 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
I've updated the website, too. Enjoy!
Andrei
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Let me give you some examples of new features
std.array.replace compile error (string and immutable string)
There's no Duration.max
Document extern properly
etc.
Compare the earlier changelogs with the bugzilla entries.
It's EXACTLY THE SAME
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:44:18 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Let me give you some examples of new features
std.array.replace compile error (string and immutable string)
There's no Duration.max
Document extern properly
On 2/17/2013 7:36 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:44:18 -0500, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Let me give you some examples of new features
std.array.replace compile error (string and immutable string)
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:54:54 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 7:36 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:44:18 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Let me give you
On 2/17/2013 9:37 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I propose that when you post the beta on the mailing list, you also post the
reports of the fixed bugs and enhancements. Then people can edit the
descriptions before the release. Then I think after the release, the
descriptions should be
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:44:18 -0800
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Let me give you some examples of new features
std.array.replace compile error (string and immutable string)
There's no Duration.max
Document extern
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:56:20 -0800
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 5:40 PM, Bill Baxter wrote:
The new change log also seems inaccessible from mobile. (At least
it seems to freak out chrome on android).
The changelog.html uses the same template as the rest of
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:30:27 -0500
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/17/13 8:02 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
I've updated the website, too. Enjoy!
I'm
On 2/17/2013 10:18 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Compare the earlier changelogs with the bugzilla entries.
It's EXACTLY THE SAME TEXT.
EXACTLY.
No it isn't.
Since I (and Jonathan) wrote the
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:02:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are
there.
Thank you Walter Bright. I appreciate your work.
On 2/17/2013 10:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I'm happy that http://dlang.org/changelog.html; no longer shows a link
for a yet-to-be-released version of DMD (no sarcasm intended), but the
release date listed for 2.062 is wrong.
Probably because the site was generated from the master branch
On 2/17/2013 5:40 PM, Bill Baxter wrote:
The new change log also seems inaccessible from mobile. (At least it seems to
freak out chrome on android).
I tried it on my ipod with Safari. Both changelog.html and bugzilla render fine,
though it helps to turn the ipod sideways to get 'landscape'
On Sunday, February 17, 2013 23:08:41 Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/17/2013 10:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I'm happy that http://dlang.org/changelog.html; no longer shows a link
for a yet-to-be-released version of DMD (no sarcasm intended), but the
release date listed for 2.062 is wrong.
On 2013-02-18 06:37, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I agree, we need a better system. Manually edited has its faults, and
the current system has its faults.
We could have a section that is edited manually with some important
highlights with proper full description of new features and
On 2013-02-18 07:31, Walter Bright wrote:
Since I (and Jonathan) wrote the changelog, I can attest that I cut
pasted it character for character out of the bugzilla titles, and
received no comments or complaints about it. I did it that way because
people on the n.g. asked me to do it that way.
On 2/17/2013 11:23 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-02-18 07:31, Walter Bright wrote:
Since I (and Jonathan) wrote the changelog, I can attest that I cut
pasted it character for character out of the bugzilla titles, and
received no comments or complaints about it. I did it that way because
77 matches
Mail list logo
