On Monday, 7 March 2022 at 09:58:32 UTC, forkit wrote:
On Monday, 7 March 2022 at 08:47:00 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 7 March 2022 at 08:07:11 UTC, forkit wrote:
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
Well.. There's 'fixing it' and there's 'improving it'.
They are not the same thing.
On Monday, 7 March 2022 at 08:47:00 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 7 March 2022 at 08:07:11 UTC, forkit wrote:
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
Well.. There's 'fixing it' and there's 'improving it'.
They are not the same thing.
In my opinion, gitlab is not an improvement.
I agree
On Monday, 7 March 2022 at 08:07:11 UTC, forkit wrote:
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
Well.. There's 'fixing it' and there's 'improving it'.
They are not the same thing.
In my opinion, gitlab is not an improvement.
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 14:03:38 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
But my point was, GitHub has worked well for us for years.
There's no desire to move away that I'm aware of. If it ain't
broke, don't fix it!
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
Well.. There's 'fixing it' and there's 'improving
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 14:03:38 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 12:39:39 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 01:21:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
But we have no reason to move the D projects away from GitHub
to GitLab. GitLab has never entered the
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 14:03:38 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 12:39:39 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 01:21:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
But we have no reason to move the D projects away from GitHub
to GitLab. GitLab has never entered the
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 12:39:39 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 01:21:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
But we have no reason to move the D projects away from GitHub
to GitLab. GitLab has never entered the conversation.
Two reasons would be that
1) It already offers [an
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 01:21:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
But we have no reason to move the D projects away from GitHub
to GitLab. GitLab has never entered the conversation.
Two reasons would be that
1) It already offers [an integration with
On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 21:44:56 UTC, Arun wrote:
On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 07:10:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 06:00:06 UTC, Arun wrote:
Just curious if we looked at GitLab as an alternative to both
GitHub and Bugzilla.
We're happy on GitHub and have no plans
On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 07:10:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 06:00:06 UTC, Arun wrote:
Just curious if we looked at GitLab as an alternative to both
GitHub and Bugzilla.
We're happy on GitHub and have no plans to move to GitLab.
Sure. You mean, GitHub +
On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 07:10:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 06:00:06 UTC, Arun wrote:
Just curious if we looked at GitLab as an alternative to both
GitHub and Bugzilla.
We're happy on GitHub and have no plans to move to GitLab.
Quoting Vladimir, "On the other
On Friday, 4 March 2022 at 06:00:06 UTC, Arun wrote:
Just curious if we looked at GitLab as an alternative to both
GitHub and Bugzilla.
We're happy on GitHub and have no plans to move to GitLab.
On Thursday, 3 March 2022 at 14:33:54 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 March 2022 at 08:12:43 UTC, bauss wrote:
[...]
I sort of agree with that. I usually don't bother reporting
anything because I don't like bugzilla, it would just be much
more convenient to use Github.
New
On Tuesday, 1 March 2022 at 08:12:43 UTC, bauss wrote:
Can't beat the nice integration and ease of access Github
provides, we need stay fresh to attract new younger souls
I sort of agree with that. I usually don't bother reporting
anything because I don't like bugzilla, it would just be much
On Monday, 28 February 2022 at 22:00:09 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Sunday, 27 February 2022 at 11:53:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
## Monthly Meeting
Just letting you know that it is posts like these that I look
forward to the most, and I very much appreciate the work that
goes into them.
On Monday, 28 February 2022 at 08:52:37 UTC, meta wrote:
On Sunday, 27 February 2022 at 11:53:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
### Vladimir
Vladimir opened with a progress report. Back in December, [we
discussed migrating our Bugzilla issues to
On Sunday, 27 February 2022 at 11:53:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
## Monthly Meeting
Just letting you know that it is posts like these that I look
forward to the most, and I very much appreciate the work that
goes into them.
Thanks!
— Bastiaan.
On Sunday, 27 February 2022 at 11:53:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
### Vladimir
Vladimir opened with a progress report. Back in December, [we
discussed migrating our Bugzilla issues to
Github](https://forum.dlang.org/post/wnnwxyjtizvhyswwq...@forum.dlang.org). An alternative solution is to
On Sunday, 27 February 2022 at 11:53:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
implementation of string interpolation should be easy to
explain to anyone.
I'm a very unimpressive programmer, and I have a reasonable
understanding of the referenced DIP, so I hope Walter will give
his blessing.
Leveraging D's
On Sunday, 27 February 2022 at 11:53:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
**ImportC**
Walter told us how he thinks ImportC is going to be a big deal
for D. He wants to get us "over the hump" with getting it
working properly. He thinks his C extension to allow importing
D files in C is working out far
On Sunday, 27 February 2022 at 11:53:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
**128-bit integers**
Finally, Walter said he has looked at implementing 128-bit
integers (cent and ucent), but implementing them in DMD would
be a nightmare. After more thought, he has decided it's
probably better to implement
## Monthly Meeting
The D Language Foundation's monthly meeting for February 2022
took place on February 4 and lasted around 1.5 hours. The
following foundation members, contractors, and contributors
attended:
Walter Bright
Iain Buclaw
Ali Çehreli
Max Haughton
Martin Kinkelin
Mathias Lang
22 matches
Mail list logo
