On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 20:50:42 UTC, Johannes Loher
wrote:
Am 30.01.19 um 15:05 schrieb Mike Parker:
Given the nature of the feedback in both review rounds this
DIP has gone through, Walter has decided to reject his own
DIP. He still believes there is a benefit to adding a bottom
Am 30.01.19 um 15:05 schrieb Mike Parker:
> Given the nature of the feedback in both review rounds this DIP has gone
> through, Walter has decided to reject his own DIP. He still believes
> there is a benefit to adding a bottom type to the language, but this
> proposal is not the way to go about
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 02:05:37PM +, Mike Parker via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> Given the nature of the feedback in both review rounds this DIP has
> gone through, Walter has decided to reject his own DIP. He still
> believes there is a benefit to adding a bottom type to the language,
>
Given the nature of the feedback in both review rounds this DIP
has gone through, Walter has decided to reject his own DIP. He
still believes there is a benefit to adding a bottom type to the
language, but this proposal is not the way to go about it. He
hopes to revisit the issue in the
