On 31/03/10 13:34, Adam Ruppe wrote:
All right, now I'm actually done for the day.
Updated the zip at the link:
http://arsdnet.net/dcode/dmdscript_d2.zip
To add a pretty interface (pretty.d). It is incomplete, but works to
play with. test.d is an example of how to use it.
auto se = new
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 21:21, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:03:10PM +0200, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
> > Cool, I wasn't sure it'd work. Now we know what this new trait is for :)
>
> It is slightly different than my old code: the getPlainName helper function
> is not required with
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:03:10PM +0200, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
> Cool, I wasn't sure it'd work. Now we know what this new trait is for :)
It is slightly different than my old code: the getPlainName helper function
is not required with the __trait. (It truncated the string at the first
paren, sin
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 20:22, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:06:11PM +0200, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
> > enum string scriptName = getPlainName!(__traits(identifier, T));
>
> Outstanding! That did it.
>
> Cool, I wasn't sure it'd work. Now we know what this new trait is for :)
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:06:11PM +0200, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
> enum string scriptName = getPlainName!(__traits(identifier, T));
Outstanding! That did it.
I'll update the zip on my website at the end of the day. I now have
wrapping of exceptions from script/native set up too. When I have the
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:34, Adam Ruppe wrote:
> All right, now I'm actually done for the day.
>
> Updated the zip at the link:
> http://arsdnet.net/dcode/dmdscript_d2.zip
>
>se.addFunction!(fun, "fun"); // adding D functions is just giving
> the names. the second arg is required since
> What I think I'd like in D is something like this, but I think there's no
> need to use JavaScript for this, it can be used just D code:
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Treehydra
This page explains what Treehydra is:
https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Treehydra_Manual
>Treehydra is meant to b
All right, now I'm actually done for the day.
Updated the zip at the link:
http://arsdnet.net/dcode/dmdscript_d2.zip
To add a pretty interface (pretty.d). It is incomplete, but works to
play with. test.d is an example of how to use it.
auto se = new ScriptEngine;
se.addFunction!(
On 3/22/2010 3:30 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/dscript/index.html
Much appreciated! Also wondering how its performance compares against V8.
On 3/29/10, Robert Clipsham wrote:
> I seem to recall it is, and a fairly old D1 at that... You could always
> update it and send a patch Walter's way, see if he accepts it :)
Walter seems to have fixed it up the the new D1; it compiled there.
And I just spent the day making a port to D2. There'
Walter Bright:
> I thought about that a lot, but CTFE seems to fill that gap well enough.
CTFE works at compile-time, while people add scripting languages like Python,
JavaScript, Groovy, Jpython, Jruby, etc, to run-time C/C++/Java code for other
purposes. For example games are often written in
Walter Bright Wrote:
> strtr wrote:
> > Scripting in de form of a dialect/subset of D in the std/language.
> > I don't know enough about scripting to say anything specific/useful.
> > It's just that if scripting were part of D, I would have used it already
> > where the possibilities mentioned by
strtr wrote:
Scripting in de form of a dialect/subset of D in the std/language.
I don't know enough about scripting to say anything specific/useful.
It's just that if scripting were part of D, I would have used it already where
the possibilities mentioned by Robert Clipsham just look that much b
Walter Bright Wrote:
> strtr wrote:
> > Walter Bright Wrote:
> >
> >> http://www.digitalmars.com/dscript/index.html
> >
> > Would it be possible to have some sort of scripting as part of D?
>
> What did you have in mind?
Scripting in de form of a dialect/subset of D in the std/language.
I don'
On 29/03/10 20:07, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 07:45:39PM +0100, Robert Clipsham wrote:
You could always write a nice wrapper function/template which
automatically does all that guff for you :) If you do, I'm sure Walter
wouldn't mind adding it into dmdscript providing you licen
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 07:45:39PM +0100, Robert Clipsham wrote:
> You could always write a nice wrapper function/template which
> automatically does all that guff for you :) If you do, I'm sure Walter
> wouldn't mind adding it into dmdscript providing you license it
> appropriately :)
Yup, tha
On 29/03/10 19:30, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:49:35PM +0100, Robert Clipsham wrote:
I haven't played with dmdscript, but
I'd guess there's a simple way to expose D functions to it.
It isn't terribly complex, but it is a bit wordy. The docs are
here: http://www.digitalmars.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:49:35PM +0100, Robert Clipsham wrote:
> I haven't played with dmdscript, but
> I'd guess there's a simple way to expose D functions to it.
It isn't terribly complex, but it is a bit wordy. The docs are
here: http://www.digitalmars.com/dscript/extending.html
You have to
On 29/03/10 18:41, Adam Ruppe wrote:
I think it would be pretty great if you could add functions, etc., to
the scripting language with a simple one liner:
mixin makeAccessibleFromScript!(scriptEngine, foo);
You can do with with MiniD, LuaD, PyD, Monster, and possibly others to
allow you to sc
I think it would be pretty great if you could add functions, etc., to
the scripting language with a simple one liner:
mixin makeAccessibleFromScript!(scriptEngine, foo);
Or something similar. The template there could mix in a wrapper
function for whatever foo() happens to be, and register it with
strtr wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/dscript/index.html
Would it be possible to have some sort of scripting as part of D?
What did you have in mind?
Walter Bright Wrote:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/dscript/index.html
Would it be possible to have some sort of scripting as part of D?
Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/dscript/index.html
Now on reddit!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/biufj/javascript_engine_released_under_boost_license/
On 22/03/10 20:30, Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/dscript/index.html
Oh wow, awesome!
Thank you.
Under svn there is both the gpl and boost license files, and no indication
which is the right one. Could you remove gpl.txt to avoid confusion?
http://www.digitalmars.com/dscript/index.html
26 matches
Mail list logo
