Re: From the D Blog -- GSoC Report: Step

2016-09-11 Thread Yuxuan Shui via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 18:46:30 UTC, jmh530 wrote: On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 18:22:02 UTC, ciechowoj wrote: I'm not sure about any special syntax which is expected for languages which have built-in sets. It would probably be overkill to add syntax support, but I'm not sure how

Re: From the D Blog -- GSoC Report: Step

2016-09-09 Thread jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 18:22:02 UTC, ciechowoj wrote: I'm not sure about any special syntax which is expected for languages which have built-in sets. It would probably be overkill to add syntax support, but I'm not sure how often people use set literals or not. E.g. Python has

Re: From the D Blog -- GSoC Report: Step

2016-09-09 Thread ciechowoj via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 17:48:10 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: With regards to Sets missing from the language: [...] Sure, but even if it is simple, there should be some standardized way to do this. To not force the people to invent the set interface in every project again and again.

Re: From the D Blog -- GSoC Report: Step

2016-09-09 Thread Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 9/9/16, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > Wojciech Szęszoł has contributed a post describing his experience > working on DStep for this year's GSoC. The post is at [1] and is > on reddit at [2]. With regards to Sets missing from the

From the D Blog -- GSoC Report: Step

2016-09-09 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
Wojciech Szęszoł has contributed a post describing his experience working on DStep for this year's GSoC. The post is at [1] and is on reddit at [2]. [1] https://dlang.org/blog/2016/09/09/gsoc-report-dstep/ [2]