Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Alexander P�nek alexander.pa...@brainsware.org wrote in message
news:gvlrua$16p...@digitalmars.com...
grauzone wrote:
browsers. What's the big deal everyone have with Javascript?
Look mah, JS and Flash combined in shiny modal windows:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Alexander P�nek alexander.pa...@brainsware.org wrote in message
news:gvm3qh$1ld...@digitalmars.com...
grauzone wrote:
Alexander P�nek wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Alexander P�nek wrote:
Look mah, JS and Flash combined in shiny modal windows:
Reply to Nick,
[sniped rant about why the web sucks]
I'll grant you most of that and I don't care about the rest.
It's ironic that this should come up in the D community because it sounds
a lot like C++ template are to the web like D template are to what the web
should be. That is; the Web
BCS a...@pathlink.com wrote in message
news:78ccfa2d417fc8cbae8318d2e...@news.digitalmars.com...
Reply to Nick,
[sniped rant about why the web sucks]
I'll grant you most of that and I don't care about the rest.
Cool and Fair enough ;)
It's ironic that this should come up in the D
Alexander Pánek wrote:
grauzone wrote:
browsers. What's the big deal everyone have with Javascript?
It's unnecessary, annoying, slower, and adds security holes.
When using Firefox, I usually use NoScript to block all scripts by
default. Sometimes, some minor things don't work, and I have to
Alexander Pánek wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Alexander Pánek wrote:
grauzone wrote:
browsers. What's the big deal everyone have with Javascript?
It's unnecessary, annoying, slower, and adds security holes.
When using Firefox, I usually use NoScript to block all scripts by
default. Sometimes,
Hello Nick,
I wish you were a higher-up at Epic ;) They seem to have pretty much
the opposite attitude, and I get so worked-up every time I see a quote
from CliffyB or any of the others...
I'm sorry to disappoint, but gaming is the only case where building to the
latest hardware has any
browsers. What's the big deal everyone have with Javascript?
It's unnecessary, annoying, slower, and adds security holes.
When using Firefox, I usually use NoScript to block all scripts by
default. Sometimes, some minor things don't work, and I have to enable
JS. Now it's really rare to see
Hello Nick,
Yes, yes, yes. This. All of it.
[...]
Anything that can be used for good can be used for ill. Yes, lots of sites
out there are junk, but that would be true no matter what tools were available.
The (long term) solution isn't to reject the tools but to figure out how
to make
grauzone n...@example.net wrote in message
news:gvc6r3$2dm...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:gvc4kc$29b...@digitalmars.com...
And, (and here's the real clincher), since I obviously can't enforce
proper design on the web, the one
I'm starting to get the impression that you just have a _really slow
Javascript interpreter_ in your browser. I have no idea what you're
talking about with text input lag. I have never experienced that.
And the Tango API opens in about 2 seconds with JS enabled for me.
What browser are you
Saaa em...@needmail.com wrote in message
news:gvcac0$2k6...@digitalmars.com...
The tango website is the slowest website I know, so I think it is an
exceptionally bad example for showing js being slow as I know a lot of
websites which use loads more of web 2.o stuff and show up in less than a
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:gvcb23$2lg...@digitalmars.com...
Saaa em...@needmail.com wrote in message
news:gvcac0$2k6...@digitalmars.com...
The tango website is the slowest website I know, so I think it is an
exceptionally bad example for showing js being slow as I know
Jarrett Billingsley jarrett.billings...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.165.1243195228.13405.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
I'm starting to get the impression that you just have a _really slow
Javascript interpreter_ in your browser. I have no idea what you're
talking about
Saaa em...@needmail.com wrote in message
news:gvcb0n$2l9...@digitalmars.com...
And then there's FlashBlock, which I *would* absolutely love...except it
*only* works with JS enabled!!! ^$^%^^!!! And frankly, I just don't
have the time to dig into FF extension-writing and do things the way I
Adblock is essential. Most ads have gotten so completely out-of-hand, I
seriously wouldn't even be using the web anymore if it weren't for Adblock.
Definitely. It's also useful for blocking other obnoxious stuff like
emoticons or avatars in those phpBB forums.
IIRC, I think NoScript does let
What browser are you *using*?
Firefox. But I often use Konqueror for serious work (!= entertainment,
wasting time). With Konqueror, some sites become dead slow with Java
Script enabled. Oh, and although Konqueror is a very nice browser,
scripting often causes malfunctions. That all just
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley jarrett.billings...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.165.1243195228.13405.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
I'm starting to get the impression that you just have a _really slow
Javascript
to get a new machine? They're like $12 now.
Where can I buy 12$ computers?
And then there's FlashBlock, which I *would* absolutely love...except it
*only* works with JS enabled!!! ^$^%^^!!! And frankly, I just don't
have the time to dig into FF extension-writing and do things the way I
really want them.
Just use noscript for blocking flash
I don't like the way
My only concern with NoScript is, enabling a site reloads all tabs
containing a script from that site. Oh, and by default, it shows some sort
of GUI animation when loading a site with blocked scripts. But you can
disable it.
As you can disable the reloading ;)
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:12 PM, grauzone n...@example.net wrote:
to get a new machine? They're like $12 now.
Where can I buy 12$ computers?
lern2hyperbole.
Some sort of multi-core 64-bit? I
don't care if that's all that the stores are currently trying to sell,
lol
Saaa wrote:
My only concern with NoScript is, enabling a site reloads all tabs
containing a script from that site. Oh, and by default, it shows some sort
of GUI animation when loading a site with blocked scripts. But you can
disable it.
As you can disable the reloading ;)
Thanks.
And going
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:12 PM, grauzone n...@example.net wrote:
to get a new machine? They're like $12 now.
Where can I buy 12$ computers?
lern2hyperbole.
Needing brand new PC hardware for using heavy websites is not really
an exaggeration, though. As soon
grauzone wrote:
Needing brand new PC hardware for using heavy websites is not really
an exaggeration, though. As soon as you have several instances of that
website loaded (in different browser windows, tabs, etc.), things are
_definitely_ starting to get no fun, even with an overclocked, 64
Jarrett Billingsley jarrett.billings...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.166.1243199156.13405.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
I use Firefox too. My computer isn't even a fire-breathing monster by
today's
Saaa em...@needmail.com wrote in message
news:gvcdpg$2q8...@digitalmars.com...
Some sort of multi-core 64-bit? I
don't care if that's all that the stores are currently trying to sell,
lol
Just trying to anticipate that argument. It's amazing how many times I've
seen people try to argue that
Hello Nick,
Just trying to anticipate that argument. It's amazing how many times
I've seen people try to argue that something isn't worth developing
for just because the stores don't sell them. What matters is what is
people are *using*, not what the stores are selling.
Should they stop
Ary Borenszweig a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote in message
news:gvcehp$2rd...@digitalmars.com...
grauzone escribió:
browsers. What's the big deal everyone have with Javascript?
It's unnecessary, annoying, slower, and adds security holes.
Anything which connects to the internet poses a security
BCS n...@anon.com wrote in message
news:a6268ff64568cbaad2fa3b9...@news.digitalmars.com...
Hello Nick,
Just trying to anticipate that argument. It's amazing how many times
I've seen people try to argue that something isn't worth developing
for just because the stores don't sell them. What
BCS escribió:
Hello Nick,
what they can do is additionally provide a
non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy since
they had to have already had one in order to upload it to craptube in
the first place.
If they can, yes, but they might not have access to general file
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
BCS escribió:
Hello Nick,
what they can do is additionally provide a
non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy since
they had to have already had one in order to upload it to craptube in
the first place.
If they can, yes, but they might not
33 matches
Mail list logo
