Re: DMD-MAC!!

2009-02-04 Thread Benji Smith
Walter Bright wrote: Benji Smith wrote: Do you know whether OSX releases will be produced for D1, or just D2? Both. Sweet. You da man. --b

Re: DMD-MAC!!

2009-02-03 Thread Benji Smith
BCS wrote: http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=1015Itemid= Very exciting! Thanks, Walter! Do you know whether OSX releases will be produced for D1, or just D2? I've had my fingers crossed that you were working on this, and I'm very happy to see that the

Re: DMD-MAC!!

2009-02-03 Thread Walter Bright
Benji Smith wrote: Do you know whether OSX releases will be produced for D1, or just D2? Both.

Re: DMD-MAC!!

2009-01-31 Thread Fawzi Mohamed
On 2009-01-29 23:19:25 +0100, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com said: Sean Kelly wrote: There are pthread calls for TLS which are implemented for OSX. But however it works (I haven't looked into it), it likely isn't as efficient or easy to deal with as the __thread storage class on

Re: DMD-MAC!!

2009-01-31 Thread Walter Bright
Fawzi Mohamed wrote: Encouraging wide use of TSL is bad in my opinion (not that you are doing it, but one might interpret it like that). If decent support for TLS is not there, then programmers will use regular global data instead, which comes with a whole raft of threading problems.

Re: DMD-MAC!!

2009-01-29 Thread Jacob Carlborg
Michel Fortin wrote: On 2009-01-28 13:02:22 -0500, BCS n...@anon.com said: http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=1015Itemid= Interesting. From the last comment from Walter at the bottom: But the Mach-O has no such special sections. I think I've found a way to