Tomas Lindquist Olsen, el 4 de julio a las 17:55 me escribiste:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Leandro Lucarella l...@llucax.com.ar
wrote:
Mmmm, I guess the fact that LDC doesn't support Phobos might be a good
reason why including Phobos is not that useful =)
I'd rather say that
On 06/26/2010 07:07 AM, bioinfornatics wrote:
previously i have write this message in D.gnu but is maybe better here.
I�am�a�fedora�packager�ldc�compiler�and�tango�will�be�go�in�official�fedora�repo.�People�who�want�learn�or�advanced�programmer�can�use�Fedora�for�develop�D�application.
when package review is good :-) less than 1 month, 1 hope 2 week
because not all is in open License, i read this:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues
Hello bioinfornatics,
because not all is in open License, i read this:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues
Looking at it I don't recognize what license most of it is under but IIRC
it's supposed to all be all under the boost license. I do know that Walter
has been
if licecense are listed in : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main
I would be add phobos to official repo, i hope it is d2 :-)
bioinfornatics, el 26 de junio a las 15:34 me escribiste:
because not all is in open License, i read this:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues
Mmmm, I guess the fact that LDC doesn't support Phobos might be a good
reason why including Phobos is not that useful =)
--
thanks for this information
phobos is not my priority.
First is LDC and Tango. Write some quideline for packagind D application.
Maybe some HowTo for D programming
