Walter Bright Wrote:
Pablo Ripolles wrote:
Can we expect this to work on Mac OS X version 10.5 still?
Yes.
All right! however in MacOSX 1.5 I've observed the following which doesn't
happens in linux:
I have a module named file.d and I have a main program named main.d. The module
is
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
Pablo Ripolles wrote:
Can we expect this to work on Mac OS X version 10.5 still?
Yes.
digited Wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
Michael P., el 23 de octubre a las 15:36 me escribiste:
digited Wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
On 2009-10-16 15:31:15 +0200, rmcguire rjmcgu...@gmail.com said:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
digited wrote:
So you don't mind that Tango is still uncompilable with 1.050 because of
hurrying,
I didn't know that. The bugzilla number which was posted as the reason
it
zsxxsz zhengshu...@hexun.com wrote:
== Quote from digited (digi...@yandex.ru)'s article
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
digited wrote:
So you don't mind that Tango is still uncompilable with 1.050 because of
hurrying,
I didn't know that. The bugzilla number which was posted as the reason
it wouldn't compile was fixed.
Hi Walter,
could you not just put
bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
Using DMD 2.035 I have tried to compile:
void main() {}
Using:
dmd -X temp.d
And the compiler crashes.
Sorry, that happens if the source file doesn't have a module statement.
MIURA Masahiro wrote:
I have built QtD r304 (latest) with DMD
2.050,
Of course that's 2.035. I'm screwed by rapid releases :-)
(I do welcome rapid releases, though)
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
digited Wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
== Quote from digited (digi...@yandex.ru)'s article
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
digited Wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
zsxxsz Wrote:
I don't think so. If there are some important bugs fixed, the new release is
necessary without caring about the release date. With dmd.2.034, I don't event
compile druntime.
So you don't mind that Tango is still uncompilable with 1.050 because of
hurrying, for third release in
Walter Bright wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
digited wrote:
So you don't mind that Tango is still uncompilable with 1.050 because of
hurrying,
I didn't know that. The bugzilla number which was posted as the reason
it wouldn't compile was fixed.
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Should I create an enhancement for this?
Might as well.
Walter Bright Wrote:
digited wrote:
So you don't mind that Tango is still uncompilable with 1.050 because of
hurrying,
I didn't know that. The bugzilla number which was posted as the reason
it wouldn't compile was fixed.
I don't try to accuse you on anything, just ask to give the
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:46:25 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
Walter Bright wrote:
Bugzilla 1534: Can't mix in a case statement.
Woo hoo!
Walter Bright, el 14 de octubre a las 20:46 me escribiste:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that
were blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
Walter Bright wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Sweet, JSON output, looks like it wasn't very hard to write :)
It was rather trivial. But it's a bit primitive right now. The problem
is I'm not writing a consumer of this data, so I'm not sure what it
should contain. Consider it as a trial balloon.
I'm interested
Walter Bright:
Using DMD 2.035 I have tried to compile:
void main() {}
Using:
dmd -X temp.d
And the compiler crashes.
Regarding the -X name, isn't something like -json better? Or better to
unify the switch for json output and normal ddoc output in some way.
Even better, DMD2 compilation
25 matches
Mail list logo
