Am Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:44:57 +0200
schrieb Dicebot m.stras...@gmail.com:
On Thursday, 6 June 2013 at 10:50:30 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Yes please, this is holding me back from updating the Gentoo
package for dmd 2.063. (Unless I want to add that missing file
as a patch.)
Why not use git
On Saturday, 8 June 2013 at 14:10:05 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
The license doesn't allow redistribution of dmd, probably in
order to have a download statistic.
The reason for this is the unfortunate backend licensing
situation. Download statistics have nothing to do with that.
David
On Thursday, 6 June 2013 at 10:50:30 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Yes please, this is holding me back from updating the Gentoo
package for dmd 2.063. (Unless I want to add that missing file
as a patch.)
Why not use git tag instead?
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 15:16:28 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hello,
We are pleased to announce that dmd 2.063, the reference
compiler of the D programming language, is now available for
download for OSX, Windows, and a variety of Unixen:
http://dlang.org/download.html
I just tried
On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 09:36 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 06/01/2013 02:31 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 13:50 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
just tried it on ubuntu 12.10, and it does the same.
are you using -defaultlib=libphobos2.so
I suspect I may be doing
Am Sun, 2 Jun 2013 07:40:27 +0200
schrieb Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de:
For some reason I still cannot build dmd 2.063 from the zip
release. I mentioned it before the release on the beta and
internals mailing lists and maybe I'm just overlooking
something trivial, but when I run make I get:
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:23 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
who packages your dmd?
Normally I would use the one from APT-D, but as this not at 2.063 as yet
I used the deb downloaded from the D download page. This necessitates
removing all packages from APT-D since they depend on exactly a
On 06/02/2013 11:48 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:23 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
who packages your dmd?
Normally I would use the one from APT-D, but as this not at 2.063 as yet
I used the deb downloaded from the D download page. This necessitates
removing all
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 12:48 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
so we are using the same package.
??
oh. dpkg -L just doesn't list it.
Symbolic links aren't in the deb, they are created by the post install
script once the shared library is installed.
but it's definitely missing from the
On 06/02/2013 12:56 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 12:48 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
so we are using the same package.
??
oh. dpkg -L just doesn't list it.
Symbolic links aren't in the deb, they are created by the post install
script once the shared library is
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 13:50 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
just tried it on ubuntu 12.10, and it does the same.
are you using -defaultlib=libphobos2.so
I suspect I may be doing different things from you as I never use an
option of that sort. Perhaps we should agree a code and command to
On 06/01/2013 02:31 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 13:50 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
just tried it on ubuntu 12.10, and it does the same.
are you using -defaultlib=libphobos2.so
I suspect I may be doing different things from you as I never use an
option of that sort.
On 5/31/13, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/30/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Hello,
We seem to have a regression affecting the zipped release:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10215
Kenji has reduced this, and apparently it's
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 00:28:58 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Perfect chance to try out the new release process. Patch 2.063
and release 2.063.1.
Actually v2.063.1 is the current one, check the dmd tags ;)
It will be v2.063.2
P.S. It has made life of linux packagers SOOO much easier ^_^
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 22:41:08 UTC, Rob T wrote:=
Prior to issuing a release like this, it should instead be made
public as a stable release candidate with full installer on
the downloads page for review by anyone. After the bugs are
worked out and some time has elapsed, the stable RC is
On 2013-05-30 17:16, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
We are pleased to announce that dmd 2.063, the reference compiler of the
D programming language, is now available for download for OSX, Windows,
and a variety of Unixen:
http://dlang.org/download.html
The -transition=field flag seems to
I want to express my sincere gratitude to everyone who has been
involved in doing this release. It is a major breakthrough in D
development and release process and a solid step towards truly
mature project.
Really, a lot of small but important changes have just happened
that make this
Nick Sabalausky, el 30 de May a las 22:47 me escribiste:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 03:50:51 +0200
Rob T al...@ucora.com wrote:
Yes, but because there's no link on the main page and no
installer, the RC's are effectively closed to the public because
only people in the know will go through the
Dicebot, el 31 de May a las 10:01 me escribiste:
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 22:41:08 UTC, Rob T wrote:=
Prior to issuing a release like this, it should instead be made
public as a stable release candidate with full installer on the
downloads page for review by anyone. After the bugs are
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 00:28:58 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 22:04:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 5/30/13, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Hello,
We seem to have a regression affecting the zipped release:
Damn you D - I'm using up a large chunk of my free time reading the improved
and very-readable Change Log.
A great update to D and Log.
-=mike=-
Great work all :-)
Many thanks to everyone involved, it really is appreciated.
Stewart
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 09:08:17 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
This is just plain and completely wrong. I don't know many
big-ish
opensource projects that doesn't have release candidates, and I
haven't
see any distribution targeted at end users using release
candidates.
Have you ever see a
Dicebot, el 31 de May a las 10:11 me escribiste:
I want to express my sincere gratitude to everyone who has been
involved in doing this release. It is a major breakthrough in D
development and release process and a solid step towards truly
mature project.
Really, a lot of small but
Dicebot, el 31 de May a las 13:44 me escribiste:
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 09:08:17 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
This is just plain and completely wrong. I don't know many big-ish
opensource projects that doesn't have release candidates, and I
haven't
see any distribution targeted at end
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:08:18 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
In mature projects RC does not differ that much from actual
release
other than by extra regression fixes. But for D process is not
THAT
smooth enough and it will take some time to settle things down.
This is pretty much how it
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:08:17 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
And I don't mean to minimize the incredible breakthrough
concerning the
release process in this cycle, just pointing out places were we
can
still do better :)
Btw, I have included minor version number into Arch Linux package
On Friday, May 31, 2013 10:17:07 Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Yeah, and that's exactly what I suggested here several times, and
ultimately at DConf :). A step forward has been made in this release,
as you said, betas were announced in this NG for the first time, before
they were announced only in
Dicebot, el 31 de May a las 16:21 me escribiste:
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:08:17 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
And I don't mean to minimize the incredible breakthrough
concerning the
release process in this cycle, just pointing out places were we
can
still do better :)
Btw, I have
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:08:17 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
About this, AFAIK 2.063.1 is really what's in the release, but
the
binary version number (and the zip name) have only 2.063. I
think that
should be fixed and the real version number should be present
in both
downloadables and
Dicebot, el 31 de May a las 16:18 me escribiste:
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:08:18 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
In mature projects RC does not differ that much from actual
release
other than by extra regression fixes. But for D process is not
THAT
smooth enough and it will take some time
On 05/30/2013 08:16 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
We are pleased to announce that dmd 2.063, the reference compiler of the
D programming language, is now available for download for OSX, Windows,
and a variety of Unixen:
The rpm package doesn't make the appropriate links in /usr/lib,
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 12:19 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
I would assume the deb package has the same shortcoming
I have not seen this with the deb on Debian Unstable.
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20
On 05/31/2013 12:32 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 12:19 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
I would assume the deb package has the same shortcoming
I have not seen this with the deb on Debian Unstable.
just tried it on ubuntu 12.10, and it does the same.
are you using
Hello,
We are pleased to announce that dmd 2.063, the reference compiler of the
D programming language, is now available for download for OSX, Windows,
and a variety of Unixen:
http://dlang.org/download.html
This release brings unprecedented progress over the previous ones, owing
to a
Discuss and vote on reddit!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1fc9jt/dmd_2063_the_d_programming_language_reference/
Andrei
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:16:28 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
For the full story, mosey to the redesigned changelog:
http://dlang.org/changelog.html
Holy changelog! That is awesome.
Please send kudos to whoever took the time to create that.
-Steve
And hackernews!
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5793041
Andrei
For the full story, mosey to the
redesigned changelog:
http://dlang.org/changelog.html
Awesome! Thanks.
On 5/30/13 11:32 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
And Facebook!
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/648837555129929
Andrei
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 15:25:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:16:28 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
For the full story, mosey to the redesigned changelog:
http://dlang.org/changelog.html
Holy changelog! That is awesome.
Am 30.05.2013 17:16, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
Hello,
We are pleased to announce that dmd 2.063, the reference compiler of the
D programming language, is now available for download for OSX, Windows,
and a variety of Unixen:
http://dlang.org/download.html
This release brings unprecedented
Steven Schveighoffer, el 30 de May a las 11:25 me escribiste:
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:16:28 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
For the full story, mosey to the redesigned changelog:
http://dlang.org/changelog.html
Holy changelog! That is awesome.
I said it
On 2013-05-30, 17:16, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For the full story, mosey to the redesigned changelog:
http://dlang.org/changelog.html
Kudos to Andrej for this. *This* is how a great changelog looks.
--
Simen
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 17:28:49 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
30-May-2013 21:16, Simen Kjaeraas пишет:
On 2013-05-30, 17:16, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For the full story, mosey to the redesigned changelog:
http://dlang.org/changelog.html
Kudos to Andrej for this. *This* is how a great
Am Thu, 30 May 2013 19:36:59 +0200
schrieb Diggory digg...@googlemail.com:
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 17:28:49 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
30-May-2013 21:16, Simen Kjaeraas пишет:
On 2013-05-30, 17:16, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For the full story, mosey to the redesigned changelog:
On 5/30/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
This release brings unprecedented progress over the previous ones, owing
to a explosive increase in collaboration and a concerted ongoing effort
to improve process.
Agreed. And recently we've had an increase in new
What a great release! Great work!
I really like the new langugage changes. One change caught my
attention: #10 The Template This Parameter now changes the
member function qualifier. Does this mean that const/immutable
ranges can implement a useful opSlice? Like
struct MyRange!T {
T[]
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 20:00:24 Mafi wrote:
What a great release! Great work!
I really like the new langugage changes. One change caught my
attention: #10 The Template This Parameter now changes the
member function qualifier. Does this mean that const/immutable
ranges can implement a
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 15:31:36 UTC, F i L wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Holy changelog! That is awesome.
Please send kudos to whoever took the time to create that.
+1, excellent work on that changelog.
This is a really nice changelog. The change and rational section
is
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 18:09:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 20:00:24 Mafi wrote:
What a great release! Great work!
I really like the new langugage changes. One change caught my
attention: #10 The Template This Parameter now changes the
member function qualifier.
On 05/30/2013 08:00 PM, Mafi wrote:
What a great release! Great work!
I really like the new langugage changes. One change caught my attention:
#10 The Template This Parameter now changes the member function
qualifier. Does this mean that const/immutable ranges can implement a
useful opSlice?
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 20:39:47 Mafi wrote:
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 18:09:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 20:00:24 Mafi wrote:
What a great release! Great work!
I really like the new langugage changes. One change caught my
attention: #10 The Template
Awesome job to all contributors, it's looking much better, and
yes the change log with examples is a very noticeable part of the
improvement.
I noted some comments about the server being under too much load.
Any thought put into adding an official torrent for downloads?
That may help ease up
W dniu 30.05.2013 19:16, Simen Kjaeraas pisze:
On 2013-05-30, 17:16, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For the full story, mosey to the redesigned changelog:
http://dlang.org/changelog.html
Kudos to Andrej for this. *This* is how a great changelog looks.
This is a very pleasant surprise to see
On 5/30/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Hello,
We seem to have a regression affecting the zipped release:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10215
But I can't recreate this in git-head. It must have been a specific
commit the release is based on that
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 22:04:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 5/30/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
wrote:
Hello,
We seem to have a regression affecting the zipped release:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10215
But I can't recreate this in git-head.
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 22:04:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 5/30/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
wrote:
Hello,
We seem to have a regression affecting the zipped release:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10215
But I can't recreate this in git-head.
On Fri, 31 May 2013 00:41:08 +0200
Rob T al...@ucora.com wrote:
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 22:04:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 5/30/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
wrote:
Hello,
We seem to have a regression affecting the zipped release:
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 01:36:15 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
That's more-or-less what already happens, the only difference
is that
(to my knowledge) there's no link to it on the downloads page.
Although, we probably could use more time between all known
regressions
in beta fixed and the
On Fri, 31 May 2013 03:50:51 +0200
Rob T al...@ucora.com wrote:
Yes, but because there's no link on the main page and no
installer, the RC's are effectively closed to the public because
only people in the know will go through the trouble to get the
RC's and install them.
I'm only talking
61 matches
Mail list logo
