Tomas Lindquist Olsen, el 4 de julio a las 17:55 me escribiste:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Leandro Lucarella
> wrote:
> >
> > Mmmm, I guess the fact that LDC doesn't support Phobos might be a good
> > reason why including Phobos is not that useful =)
>
> I'd rather say that phobos1 doe
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
>
> Mmmm, I guess the fact that LDC doesn't support Phobos might be a good
> reason why including Phobos is not that useful =)
>
I'd rather say that phobos1 doesn't support LDC ;)
thanks for this information
phobos is not my priority.
First is LDC and Tango. Write some quideline for packagind D application.
Maybe some HowTo for D programming
bioinfornatics, el 26 de junio a las 15:34 me escribiste:
> because not all is in open License, i read this:
> http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues
Mmmm, I guess the fact that LDC doesn't support Phobos might be a good
reason why including Phobos is not that useful =)
--
Le
bioinfornatics, el 26 de junio a las 16:14 me escribiste:
> if licecense are listed in : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main
>
> I would be add phobos to official repo, i hope it is d2 :-)
LDC doesn't work with Phobos for D1 because it uses the Tango runtime.
And it doesn't compile D2 e
if licecense are listed in : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main
I would be add phobos to official repo, i hope it is d2 :-)
On Jun 26, 10 23:43, BCS wrote:
Hello bioinfornatics,
because not all is in open License, i read this:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues
Looking at it I don't recognize what license most of it is under but
IIRC it's supposed to all be all under the boost license. I d
Hello bioinfornatics,
because not all is in open License, i read this:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues
Looking at it I don't recognize what license most of it is under but IIRC
it's supposed to all be all under the boost license. I do know that Walter
has been car
because not all is in open License, i read this:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues
Hello bioinfornatics,
previously i have write this message in D.gnu but is maybe better
here.
ldc compiler and tango will be go in official fedora repo.
Great news, but why Tango and not also Phoboes?
--
... <
On 06/26/2010 08:43 AM, bioinfornatics wrote:
when package review is good :-) less than 1 month, 1 hope 2 week
Cool
when package review is good :-) less than 1 month, 1 hope 2 week
On 06/26/2010 07:07 AM, bioinfornatics wrote:
previously i have write this message in D.gnu but is maybe better here.
I�am�a�fedora�packager�ldc�compiler�and�tango�will�be�go�in�official�fedora�repo.�People�who�want�learn�or�advanced�programmer�can�use�Fedora�for�develop�D�application.
I�put�her
previously i have write this message in D.gnu but is maybe better here.
I�am�a�fedora�packager�ldc�compiler�and�tango�will�be�go�in�official�fedora�repo.�People�who�want�learn�or�advanced�programmer�can�use�Fedora�for�develop�D�application.
I�put�here�a�temporary�link�to�b�ta�src.rpm and spec file
14 matches
Mail list logo
