Re: mir.complex

2021-08-30 Thread jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 13:26:09 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote: [snip] Why wasn't fixing the linking bugs considered an alternative to forking std.complex? What are the other remaining reasons for not using std.complex? It doesn't look like any bug reports were filed. Hopefully that can happ

Re: mir.complex

2021-08-30 Thread Per Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 17:02:33 UTC, 9il wrote: There are few reasons. The main one is that linking bugs caused by a compiler mangling/generation bugs makes std.complex unusable for us. Initially I have updated all packages with std.complex, however it failed to link in a private project.

Re: mir.complex

2021-08-20 Thread Tejas via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 17:03:52 UTC, 9il wrote: On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:55:57 UTC, David Gileadi wrote: On 8/20/21 9:54 AM, Dennis wrote: On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:44:53 UTC, 9il wrote: Builtin complex numbers have been replaced with mir.complex in the following packages

Re: mir.complex

2021-08-20 Thread 9il via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:55:57 UTC, David Gileadi wrote: On 8/20/21 9:54 AM, Dennis wrote: On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:44:53 UTC, 9il wrote: Builtin complex numbers have been replaced with mir.complex in the following packages: Out of curiosity, how did std.complex fall short

Re: mir.complex

2021-08-20 Thread 9il via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:54:07 UTC, Dennis wrote: On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:44:53 UTC, 9il wrote: Builtin complex numbers have been replaced with mir.complex in the following packages: Out of curiosity, how did std.complex fall short? There are few reasons. The main one is that

Re: mir.complex

2021-08-20 Thread David Gileadi via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 8/20/21 9:54 AM, Dennis wrote: On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:44:53 UTC, 9il wrote: Builtin complex numbers have been replaced with mir.complex in the following packages: Out of curiosity, how did std.complex fall short? Maybe it was too complex? Sorry, I'll see myself out.

Re: mir.complex

2021-08-20 Thread Dennis via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 20 August 2021 at 16:44:53 UTC, 9il wrote: Builtin complex numbers have been replaced with mir.complex in the following packages: Out of curiosity, how did std.complex fall short?

mir.complex

2021-08-20 Thread 9il via Digitalmars-d-announce
mir.complex [1] has been added to mir-core v1.1.80 Builtin complex numbers have been replaced with mir.complex in the following packages: - cblas, - lapack - mir-blas - mir-lapack - lubeck [1] http://mir-core.libmir.org/mir_complex.html MRs are welcome. Kind regards, Ilya