Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/11/10 7:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/11/10 7:23 AM, Michael Rynn wrote:
Availability of Updated xml parser for D2,
organised very presumptively as std.xml2
[snip]
Great! Do you plan to submit this to Phobos?
One more thing - with XML parsers,
If you take into account that tango's xml parser does less validation and
that it is up to par with the fastest C++ parsers out there, I suggest
lowering the bar a little bit at first. For example, outperforming
libxml2.
There is no reason a D code should perform worse than C++ if you are not
so wrote:
If you take into account that tango's xml parser does less validation and
that it is up to par with the fastest C++ parsers out there, I suggest
lowering the bar a little bit at first. For example, outperforming
libxml2.
There is no reason a D code should perform worse than C++
Hello,
It's great to see interest in replacing std.xml. I am also working on a
replacement for std.xml, maybe we can collaborate on this and not duplicate
effort. We should choose one of our codebase and develop from there a strong
alternative.
I propose my codebase for the following 2 reasons:
Availability of Updated xml parser for D2,
organised very presumptively as std.xml2
Downloadable with SVN.
svn co http://svn.dsource.org/projects/xmlp/trunk/std
(release 20).
This imports a conventional DOM of linked nodes -- std.xmlp.linkdom
A Core parser which emits parsed items
On 12/11/10 7:23 AM, Michael Rynn wrote:
Availability of Updated xml parser for D2,
organised very presumptively as std.xml2
[snip]
Great! Do you plan to submit this to Phobos?
Andrei
On 12/11/10 7:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/11/10 7:23 AM, Michael Rynn wrote:
Availability of Updated xml parser for D2,
organised very presumptively as std.xml2
[snip]
Great! Do you plan to submit this to Phobos?
One more thing - with XML parsers, I think Tango has definitely
