I have made a little beginning attempt at understanding the phobos xml
modules. For a warm up exercise, I took the std.xml and std.encoding
from phobos 2, and made them into std2.xml and std2.encoding in the
DSource project std2, so the dmd 1.0 compiler took a tour tripping up
all over the code.
I cannot believe that anybody actually uses the std2 project files.
Why do you believe this?
I do..
Ran unit tests and also successfully rab the books.xml example.
Ok, so I can use this one as well, thanks!
Re-enabled the disabled unittest in std.encoding, and fixed the little
bug that was
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Michael
Rynnmichaelr...@optushome.com.au wrote:
I have made a little beginning attempt at understanding the phobos xml
modules. For a warm up exercise, I took the std.xml and std.encoding
from phobos 2, and made them into std2.xml and std2.encoding in the
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Michael
Rynnmichaelr...@optushome.com.au wrote:
I took away all the safety features of const, immutable and any other
things that dmd 1.0 complains about, as recommended for the std2.
Well, different people feel differently about these things. IMO, the
