Walter Bright wrote:
I gather this only works with Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard ?
$ dmd/osx/bin/dmd hello.d
Bus error
Could it be rebuilt with the MacOSX10.4u.sdk, perhaps ?
It works with whatever came with the Mac mini install disk g. I have
no idea about other setups.
It works on Mac OS X
Anders F Björklund wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
I suppose that explains the bus error. But I love this: The Firebird
build environment now uses both - just to make 100% certain. Blech.
Anyone know for sure? I hate randomly trying things.
Set both of them... They're for the same thing, but as
Walter Bright wrote:
Anders F Björklund wrote:
-mmacosx-version-min=10.4
I recompiled with that switch, and uploaded a new dmd.1.040.zip. Can you
give it a try, please?
You did add *both* the switches, right ? One for MDT, one for SDK.
(MDT is for choosing functions, SDK chooses headers
Anders F Björklund wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Anders F Björklund wrote:
-mmacosx-version-min=10.4
I recompiled with that switch, and uploaded a new dmd.1.040.zip. Can
you give it a try, please?
You did add *both* the switches, right ? One for MDT, one for SDK.
(MDT is for choosing
Walter Bright wrote:
It still fails on Mac OS X 10.4, maybe it still used native SDK ?
(if it matters, it gets a null dereference in _malloc_initialize)
Ok, I tried it with both switches now. Please give it a try.
No luck, same problem. Might want to add requires Mac OS X 10.5
or something
On 2009-02-15 04:30:28 -0500, Anders F Björklund a...@algonet.se said:
Walter Bright wrote:
Anders F Björklund wrote:
-mmacosx-version-min=10.4
I recompiled with that switch, and uploaded a new dmd.1.040.zip. Can
you give it a try, please?
You did add *both* the switches, right ? One for
Walter Bright wrote:
No luck, same problem. Might want to add requires Mac OS X 10.5
or something for now ? Upgraded wxD CVS to support DMD on Mac too.
Yeah, that looks like the best strategy for the moment. It seems odd
that there is such confusion about something that should be documented
On 2009-02-15 08:42:53 -0500, Anders F Björklund a...@algonet.se said:
I thought GCC 4.0.1 and later did that for you automatically ?
i.e. passed -syslibroot to the linker when using -isysroot
--anders
Hum, indeed, I think you're right. Seems like this Apple documentation
is outdated:
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step when
compiling example, optlink crashed with a messagebox containing X86 registers
content. This seems to be a blocker for qtd working on windows..
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:06:46 -0500, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step when
compiling example, optlink crashed with a messagebox containing X86 registers
content. This seems to be a blocker for qtd working
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step when
compiling example, optlink crashed with a messagebox containing X86 registers
content. This seems to be a blocker for qtd working
Walter Bright wrote:
Now includes Mac OSX version!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.040.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.025.zip
Expect bugs. Thread local storage isn't working on OSX, neither
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Max Samukha
samu...@voliacable.com.removethis wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:06:46 -0500, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step when
compiling example, optlink crashed with a
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step
when compiling example, optlink crashed with a messagebox containing X86
registers content. This seems to be a
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step
when compiling example,
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows. But at the very last step
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
Anders F Björklund wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
No luck, same problem. Might want to add requires Mac OS X 10.5
or something for now ? Upgraded wxD CVS to support DMD on Mac too.
Yeah, that looks like the best strategy for the moment. It seems odd
that there is such confusion about something
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Now includes Mac OSX version!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.040.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.025.zip
Expect bugs. Thread local storage isn't
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:55:58 +0900, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Max Samukha
samu...@voliacable.com.removethis wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:06:46 -0500, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally we managed to compile qtd for Windows.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason why is this file is big is in this bug
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 And I don't thing that
placing enums outside the class is a good idea, because enums will be exposed
to
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:gn78ho$hm...@digitalmars.com...
Now includes Mac OSX version!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.040.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
Ok, try downloading dmd1 again.
Lionello Lunesu wrote:
dmd.2.025.zip has a file called lib (no extension) in the dmd folder.
Sounds like a copy something \dmd\lib ? Its size is similar to
gcstub.obj, is that it?
eh, just delete it!
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason why is this file is big is in this bug
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=282 And I don't thing that
placing enums outside the class is a good idea, because enums will be
exposed to
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:11:38 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
Now includes Mac OSX version!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.040.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.025.zip
Expect bugs.
Walter Bright wrote:
Now includes Mac OSX version!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.040.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.025.zip
Expect bugs. Thread local storage isn't working on OSX, neither
Hello Dejan,
Well done!
When can we expect 64bit version of DMD?
OSX is still 32bit x86 so don't get your hopes up.
Dejan Lekic wrote:
When can we expect 64bit version of DMD?
Nobody's ever satisfied g.
It has to be done sooner or later. Probably sooner.
Walter Bright wrote:
Must have been unlucky, or doing things outside the dotted lines,
or both... Because usually it does just work with the MDT and SDK.
I don't know how my new Mac mini, with an utterly default install, could
possibly be outside the dotted lines. man gcc lists about a
31 matches
Mail list logo
