On 06/26/2010 07:07 AM, bioinfornatics wrote:
previously i have write this message in D.gnu but is maybe better here.
I�am�a�fedora�packager�ldc�compiler�and�tango�will�be�go�in�official�fedora�repo.�People�who�want�learn�or�advanced�programmer�can�use�Fedora�for�develop�D�application.
En/na Jesse Phillips ha escrit:
Jordi Sayol i Salomó Wrote:
I don't think you can have a universally accepted (i386, amd64) package.
i386 systems will have their packages named without any postfix, but on
amd64 distro the packages will. If you add those packages as a requirement
they
when package review is good :-) less than 1 month, 1 hope 2 week
On 06/25/2010 03:49 PM, Jordi Sayol i Salomó wrote:
No, I don't have my reference to this. You do NOT have multiple
packages modify the configuration file! You can either choose a
master packagethat provides a program to manage the configuration
file, or you put that program in a new package
En/na Ellery Newcomer ha escrit:
On 06/25/2010 03:49 PM, Jordi Sayol i Salomó wrote:
No, I don't have my reference to this. You do NOT have multiple
packages modify the configuration file! You can either choose a
master packagethat provides a program to manage the configuration
file, or you
On 06/26/2010 09:46 AM, Jordi Sayol i Salomó wrote:
maybe an alternative would be to just define
/usr/lib/dmd-xxx/
/usr/include/dmd-xxx/
and in dmd.conf:
[Environment]
DFLAGS = -L-L/usr/lib/dmd-xxx -I/usr/include/dmd-xxx
and have any additional library put its stuff directly in those two
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:37:40 +0200, Jordi Sayol i Salomó wrote:
I'll ask you this, for RPM if it is stated to be a 32 bit package, can
you installed it without forcing the install on a 64 bit system?
No, You have to force on 64 bits system, but You can assure dependencies
in both, 32 and 64
because not all is in open License, i read this:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues
Hello bioinfornatics,
because not all is in open License, i read this:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues
Looking at it I don't recognize what license most of it is under but IIRC
it's supposed to all be all under the boost license. I do know that Walter
has been
En/na Jesse Phillips ha escrit:
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:37:40 +0200, Jordi Sayol i Salomó wrote:
I'll ask you this, for RPM if it is stated to be a 32 bit package, can
you installed it without forcing the install on a 64 bit system?
No, You have to force on 64 bits system, but You can assure
if licecense are listed in : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main
I would be add phobos to official repo, i hope it is d2 :-)
bioinfornatics, el 26 de junio a las 15:34 me escribiste:
because not all is in open License, i read this:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues
Mmmm, I guess the fact that LDC doesn't support Phobos might be a good
reason why including Phobos is not that useful =)
--
thanks for this information
phobos is not my priority.
First is LDC and Tango. Write some quideline for packagind D application.
Maybe some HowTo for D programming
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:59:01 +0200, Jordi Sayol i Salomó wrote:
Where to place druntime lib and headers?
You could then put them in yet another lib package. I realize this is
unreasonable when you don't have a repository to pull in everything
needed so it is reasonable to place everything in
14 matches
Mail list logo
