On 6/26/2014 2:26 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
https://github.com/economicmodeling
Stuff that's been made available:
* D implementation of the DDoc macro processor
* Documentation generator that doesn't need the compiler
- No more requirement to use all the -I options to just get docs.
-
On 06/27/2014 09:16 AM, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 6/26/2014 2:26 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
https://github.com/economicmodeling
Stuff that's been made available:
* D implementation of the DDoc macro processor
* Documentation generator that doesn't need the compiler
On 2014-06-26 23:26, Brian Schott wrote:
* Documentation generator that doesn't need the compiler
Do you have any example of documentation generated with this tool?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 26 June 2014 at 21:26:55 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
* Documentation generator that doesn't need the compiler
How does it relate to ddox?
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/298vtt/dconf_2014_panel_with_walter_bright_and_andrei/
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/482546357690187776
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/874091959271153
Andrei
http://youtu.be/TNvUIWFy02I
https://github.com/economicmodeling/containers/blob/master/src/containers/dynamicarray.d#L72
Does this work? You try to remove new range instead of old one.
Also you should remove old range only after you added new range,
so that GC won't catch you in the middle.
And then it will still be able to catch you between realloc and
addRange.
On 6/27/2014 12:53 PM, Dicebot wrote:
http://youtu.be/TNvUIWFy02I
Ack, need to work on my posture :-(
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 20:33:22 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
https://github.com/economicmodeling/containers/blob/master/src/containers/dynamicarray.d#L72
Does this work? You try to remove new range instead of old one.
Also you should remove old range only after you added new
range, so that GC
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 12:31:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 26 June 2014 at 21:26:55 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
* Documentation generator that doesn't need the compiler
How does it relate to ddox?
DDOX uses the compiler's JSON output. This new documentation
generator only looks at
I have two questions that I've come upon lately:
1) How was it decided that there should be implicit conversion
between signed and unsigned integers in arithmetic operations,
and why prefer unsigned numbers?
E.g. Signed / Unsigned = Unsigned
Is this simply compatibility with C or is there
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 23:30:39 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
2) With regard to reducing template instantiations:
I've been using a technique similar to the one mentioned in the
video: separating functions out of templates to reduce bloat.
My question is: does a template such as:
T foo(T)(T x)
if
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 02:02:28 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 23:30:39 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
2) With regard to reducing template instantiations:
I've been using a technique similar to the one mentioned in
the video: separating functions out of templates to reduce
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 02:46:25 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 02:02:28 UTC, Peter Alexander
int a;
const int b;
immutable int c;
foo(a);
foo(b);
foo(c);
These all call foo!int
Awesome, thanks!
... I just tried this and I'm wrong. The qualifier isn't
stripped.
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 03:33:37 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
... I just tried this and I'm wrong. The qualifier isn't
stripped. Gah! Three different versions!
I could have sworn D did this for primitive types. This makes
me sad :-(
I guess you can make all kinds of code that depends
16 matches
Mail list logo
