Re: amoeba, a chess engine written in D

On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 23:16:01 UTC, Richard Delorme wrote: I am pleased to announce the release of a chess engine written in D: https://github.com/abulmo/amoeba I am not aware of any other chess engine written with the D language. The source can be compiled with dmd, ldc or gdc, but the

amoeba, a chess engine written in D

I am pleased to announce the release of a chess engine written in D: https://github.com/abulmo/amoeba I am not aware of any other chess engine written with the D language. The source can be compiled with dmd, ldc or gdc, but the best performance are obtained with the latter (almost twice

Re: My ACCU 2016 keynote video available online

On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 20:04:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 5/20/16 2:13 PM, Jens Müller wrote: No it doesn't work because you need to break in the last case. Consider the case when the last element of a is equal to an element in b. Next iteration you overrun a. I'm not that

Re: My ACCU 2016 keynote video available online

On 5/20/16 2:13 PM, Jens Müller wrote: No it doesn't work because you need to break in the last case. Consider the case when the last element of a is equal to an element in b. Next iteration you overrun a. I'm not that Bright :o). So you'd need one more test, but you still save the other test

Re: My ACCU 2016 keynote video available online

On 5/20/2016 6:47 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: Not to mention inconsistency in what exactly is being tested for: if you want to check if something is an input range, do you use is(typeof(R.empty)), etc., or should you use __traits(compiles, R.init.empty), or is it

[OT] Re: pl0stuff an optimizing pl0 > c transcompiler

On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 18:04:55 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: Update I have implemented D codegen. The CodeGenerator as well as the optimizer work at CTFE. Therefore you can transcompile code at compileTime at call PL/0 functions as there were naively implemented in D. This is pretty cool :D

Re: My ACCU 2016 keynote video available online

On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 14:14:18 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 05/19/2016 06:50 PM, Jens Müller wrote: What if you stomped over an index in a that has as an equal index in b (it could be anywhere in b). Hmmm, you're right. So that doesn't work, or at least not efficiently (the fixup

Re: pl0stuff an optimizing pl0 > c transcompiler

On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 18:04:55 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: Therefore you can transcompile code at compileTime at call PL/0 functions as there were naively implemented in D. If you do want to call functions from D. You cannot use the optimizer. As it does _very_ aggressive inlineing and will

Re: pl0stuff an optimizing pl0 > c transcompiler

On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 16:41:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 10:45:59 UTC, Nick B wrote: what languages do you plan to support for input and output ? I just planned on PL/0 as input and C as output. It is a simple one-pass (okay 2 pass if you count the

Re: D's Auto Decoding and You

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 14:06:37 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote: Related discussion https://trello.com/c/4XmFdcp6/163-rediscuss-redundant-utf-8-string-validation.

Re: My ACCU 2016 keynote video available online

On 05/19/2016 06:50 PM, Jens Müller wrote: What if you stomped over an index in a that has as an equal index in b (it could be anywhere in b). Hmmm, you're right. So that doesn't work, or at least not efficiently (the fixup would entail a binary search in b). How about this idea: arrange

Re: My ACCU 2016 keynote video available online

On 19 May 2016 at 22:10, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On 5/18/16 7:42 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: >> >> On 16 May 2016 at 23:46, Andrei Alexandrescu via >> Digitalmars-d-announce