On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 06:42:23 UTC, Arun
Chandrasekaran wrote:
It takes a lot of time and effort to write such quality
content. Thanks for detailed explanations.
Thanks :)
Now if we had a magic automaton that makes more of these ...
// import std.algorithm, std.exception,
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 07:11:08 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 02:57:28 UTC, ketmar wrote:
Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 03:40:41 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread today and I
thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive my blog and finally
write an article showing why I like D so much:
https://seb.wilzba.ch/b/2018/02/the-expressive-c17-coding-challenge-in-d
It's mostly
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 23:35:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive
my blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so
much:
On 02/13/2018 03:35 PM, Seb wrote:
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread today and I
thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive my blog and finally
write an article showing why I like D so much:
On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 14:29:27 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Given the insane complexities of DTD that I'm only slowly beginning to
> grasp from actually reading the spec, I'm quickly adopting the opinion
> that dxml should remain as-is, and any DTD implementation should
On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 14:13:36 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Great, just
> great. Now I know why I've always had this gut feeling that
> *something* is off about the whole XML mania.)
Well, there are plenty of folks who talk like XML is a pile of steaming muck
that
Someone revived the Expressive C++17 Coding Challenge thread
today and I thought this is an excellent opportunity to revive my
blog and finally write an article showing why I like D so much:
https://seb.wilzba.ch/b/2018/02/the-expressive-c17-coding-challenge-in-d
It's mostly targeted at
On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 21:18:12 Patrick Schluter via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> There's also the issue that entity references open a whole can of
> worms concerning security. It quite possible to have an
> exponential growing entity replacement that can take down any
> parser.
Well,
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 20:10:59 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 15:22:32 Kagamin via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 16:50:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> The core problem is that entity references get replaced with
> more XML
On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 15:20:29 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Monday, 16 November 2015 at 15:20:51 UTC, Andrei
Congratulations to everybody who co
Andrei
Old post but new numbers!
http://erdani.com/d/downloads.daily.png
Would be nice to know what caused the recent spike to
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 17:05:32 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
This new release fixes bugs and speeds up opening files by
using `--nodeps --skip-registry=all` if the dependent packages
have already been downloaded.
Thanks!
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 02:53:21 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 02/12/2018 11:15 AM, rikki cattermole wrote:
dxml 7.5k LOC
std.xml 3k LOC
dxml would make the situation a lot worse.
4.5k LOC == "a lot worse"?
Uuuuhhh...WAT?
And it's like 2k LOC of code and 5.5k LOC of
On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 16:50:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
The core problem is that entity references get replaced with
more XML that needs to be parsed. So, they can't simply be
passed on for post-processing. As I understand it, they have to
be replaced while the parsing is going
On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 14:54 +, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> […]
>
> Personally I find J.M.D. arguments quite reasonable for a third-
> party
> library, since yes it does cover 90% of the use cases.
The problem is that std.xml needs removing to make it clear there is
On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 21:51:56 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
We can even design the DTD support wrapper to start with being
just a thin wrapper around dxml, and lazily switch to full DTD
mode only if a DTD section is encountered. Then user code that
doesn't care to use dxml's raw API
On Sunday, 11 February 2018 at 09:36:53 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Support for D was added in the recent days. More information
about camisole https://camisole.prologin.org/
Did not know about this platform. Neat!
22 matches
Mail list logo
