Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
Sean Kelly wrote:
Don wrote:
We also now have two modules called 'bitmanip', which is somewhat ironic
since we brainstormed for ages trying to come up with a better name for
it. Modules with duplicate names have caused linking problems in the
past -- not sure if that
Sean Kelly:
Alternatives to core are: lang, d, base... But I like core the best so far.
d is the name of the package my libs, so I hope you will use something
different :-) (But this isn't really much important).
A possible organization (if technically possible) that looks more symmetric to
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rjk/allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/
Andrei
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:37:43 +, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:27:58 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rjk/
allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:52:34 +0900, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rjk/
allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/