On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Bill Baxter" wrote
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> "Benji Smith" wrote
Bill Baxter wrote:
> Benji Smith wrote:
>> The key is to never never nev
"Bill Baxter" wrote
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Benji Smith" wrote
>>> Bill Baxter wrote:
Benji Smith wrote:
> The key is to never never never use the cygwin shell. It's a piece of
> garbage. But using the executables from th
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Benji Smith" wrote
>> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>> Benji Smith wrote:
The key is to never never never use the cygwin shell. It's a piece of
garbage. But using the executables from the "cygwin\bin" directory
"Benji Smith" wrote
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> Benji Smith wrote:
>>> The key is to never never never use the cygwin shell. It's a piece of
>>> garbage. But using the executables from the "cygwin\bin" directory
>>> within
>>> the windows shell... Priceless!
>>
>> Oh, I didn't realize that. There is
"Bill Baxter" wrote
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Benji Smith" wrote
>>> Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Benji Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yigal Chripun wrote:
>> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Benji Smith" wrote
>> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Se
"Benji Smith" wrote
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Yigal Chripun wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Sergey Gromov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:43:19 +0900,
>>>
"Bill Baxter" wrote
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, ore-sama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Bill Baxter Wrote:
>>
>>> (like I haven't been able to figure out how to get the
>>> DOS console in Windows to display UTF-8)
>>
>> Console is a legacy technology (you even still call it "DOS"), why expect
Bill Baxter wrote:
Benji Smith wrote:
The key is to never never never use the cygwin shell. It's a piece of
garbage. But using the executables from the "cygwin\bin" directory within
the windows shell... Priceless!
Oh, I didn't realize that. There is one thing that doesn't work,
which is proba
>> But that has the same problem. Cygtools don't understand windows
>> paths so barf when you say "grep c:\foo.txt" But the Windows shell
>> only will only autocomplete Windows-style paths.
>>
>> I've found the gnuwin32 tools to work a little better on that front.
>>
> Wha???
>
> The "grep" tool
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Yigal Chripun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Bill Baxter wro
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yigal Chripun wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Sergey Gromov <[EMAI
Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
>>> Anyone using a shell for Windows that works and supports UTF-8
>>>
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Sergey Gromov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:43:19 +0900,
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, o
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
>> Anyone using a shell for Windows that works and supports UTF-8
>> properly?
>>
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yigal Chripun wrote:
>>
>> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Sergey Gromov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:43:19 +0900,
Bill Baxter wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 2
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
Anyone using a shell for Windows that works and supports UTF-8 properly?
A regular Windows console supports UTF-8 to some extent:
* Change console font to Lucida Console
* issue "chc
Yigal Chripun wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Sergey Gromov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:43:19 +0900,
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, ore-sama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
(like I haven't been able to figure o
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Yigal Chripun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Sergey Gromov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:43:19 +0900,
>>> Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, ore-sama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Benji Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
Anyone using a shell for Windows that works and supports UTF-8 properly?
>>>
>>> A regular Windows console supports UTF-8 to some extent:
>>>
>>> * Change console font to Lucida Console
>>> * iss
Bill Baxter wrote:
Anyone using a shell for Windows that works and supports UTF-8 properly?
A regular Windows console supports UTF-8 to some extent:
* Change console font to Lucida Console
* issue "chcp 65001"
You can even get more fonts into there with a bit of hackery.
I did that but "type
Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Sergey Gromov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:43:19 +0900,
>> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, ore-sama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
> (like I haven't been able to figure ou
Sean Kelly, el 22 de octubre a las 16:14 me escribiste:
> Jason House wrote:
> >Sean Kelly Wrote:
> >>Don wrote:
> >>>'std', 'stdc' and 'sys' sound OK to me. Although is there any reason why
> >>>stdc couldn't be part of 'sys'?
> >>>IMHO: 'common' sounds far too generic. 'core' is borderline.
> >>
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Sergey Gromov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:43:19 +0900,
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, ore-sama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Bill Baxter Wrote:
>> >
>> >> (like I haven't been able to figure out how to get the
>> >> D
Jesse Phillips, el 23 de octubre a las 02:04 me escribiste:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:44:56 +0200, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:42:05 +0200, Sean Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Don wrote:
> >>> 'std', 'stdc' and 'sys' sound OK to me. Although is there any reas
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:43:19 +0900,
Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, ore-sama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bill Baxter Wrote:
> >
> >> (like I haven't been able to figure out how to get the
> >> DOS console in Windows to display UTF-8)
> >
> > Console is a legacy technology (you
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, ore-sama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Baxter Wrote:
>
>> (like I haven't been able to figure out how to get the
>> DOS console in Windows to display UTF-8)
>
> Console is a legacy technology (you even still call it "DOS"), why expect
> features from it?
So te
Bill Baxter Wrote:
> (like I haven't been able to figure out how to get the
> DOS console in Windows to display UTF-8)
Console is a legacy technology (you even still call it "DOS"), why expect
features from it?
Reply to dsimcha,
== Quote from BCS ([EMAIL PROTECTED])'s article
Reply to dsimcha,
Since there's really no good comprehensive statistics library for D
(Tango has a little bit, the beginnings of a few are on dsource, but
nothing much), Ive been rolling my own statistics functions as
necessar
Bruno Medeiros:
>* Having non-unicode versions of the symbols/keywords available in Unicode,
>such that non-Uunicode editing and viewing is always possible as a fallback.
>This has some important consequences though, such as making
>Unicode-symbol-usage unable to solve the shortage of brackets f
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:52:03 +0200, Bruno Medeiros
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
As an example, while I'd enjoy seeing code like this, I'm not sure I'd
enjoy writing it (Note that I am prone to exaggerations):
int a = ∅; //empty set, same as "= void"
int[] b = [1,2,3,4,
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
As an example, while I'd enjoy seeing code like this, I'm not sure I'd
enjoy writing it (Note that I am prone to exaggerations):
int a = ∅; //empty set, same as "= void"
int[] b = [1,2,3,4,5,6];
a = readInt();
Hum, interesting example, it actual
Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
As an example, while I'd enjoy seeing code like this, I'm not sure I'd
enjoy writing it (Note that I am prone to exaggerations):
int a = ∅; //empty set, same as "= void"
int[] b = [1,2,3,4,5,6];
a = readInt();
Hum, interesting example, it actually made me realize that
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:28:51 +0200, Bruno Medeiros
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rjk/allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/
Andrei
I'm unsure abo
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rjk/allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/
Andrei
I'm unsure about this idea.
I don't know if it would be worthwhile, but I would say there are two
digited wrote:
torhu Wrote:
I tried building DWT with -lib when that feature was first added. -lib
seems to be broken somehow, because just compiling one file at a time
results in a much smaller .lib file.
That's normal (really a feature, not a bug) - "-lib" creates more than one
object
== Quote from Don ([EMAIL PROTECTED])'s article
> > Binomial, hypergeometric, normal, Poisson, Kolmogorov CDFs, hypergeometric,
> > Poisson, binomial PDFs. Inverse normal distribution,
> Most of these are in Tango (not Kolmogorov). Are yours different in some
> way?
They calculate the exact log f
== Quote from BCS ([EMAIL PROTECTED])'s article
> Reply to dsimcha,
> > Since there's really no good comprehensive statistics library for D
> > (Tango has a little bit, the beginnings of a few are on dsource, but
> > nothing much), Ive been rolling my own statistics functions as
> > necessary. Alm
KennyTM~ wrote:
1.2) Some suggested auto-correction in the IDE. Again what if I used
notepad/nano/TextEdit to code?
Then I suggest a change in career... ^^'
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Developer, MSc. in CS/E graduate
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D
dsimcha wrote:
Since there's really no good comprehensive statistics library for D (Tango has
a little bit, the beginnings of a few are on dsource, but nothing much), Ive
been rolling my own statistics functions as necessary. Almost by accident, it
seems like I've built up the beginnings of a de
40 matches
Mail list logo
