Now includes Mac OSX version!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.040.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.025.zip
Expect bugs. Thread local storage isn't working on OSX, neither are
sockets and
Walter Bright wrote:
Now includes Mac OSX version!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.040.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.025.zip
Expect bugs. Thread local storage isn't working on OSX, neither
Walter Bright wrote:
Now includes Mac OSX version!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.040.zip
...
Expect bugs. Thread local storage isn't working on OSX, neither are
sockets and memory mapped files (for unknown reasons).
Thanks to Sean Kelly
Anders F Björklund wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Now includes Mac OSX version!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.040.zip
...
Expect bugs. Thread local storage isn't working on OSX, neither are
sockets and memory mapped files (for unknown
Extrawurst wrote:
Very nice, but what happened to version 2.024 ?
test version
Anders F Björklund wrote:
I gather this only works with Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard ?
$ dmd/osx/bin/dmd hello.d
Bus error
Could it be rebuilt with the MacOSX10.4u.sdk, perhaps ?
Is 10.5 really binary incompatible with 10.4 ? And not even a nice
message when it isn't?
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:gn7cvo$to...@digitalmars.com...
Anders F Björklund wrote:
I gather this only works with Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard ?
$ dmd/osx/bin/dmd hello.d
Bus error
Could it be rebuilt with the MacOSX10.4u.sdk, perhaps ?
Is 10.5 really binary
On 2009-02-14 16:27:22 -0500, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com said:
Anders F Björklund wrote:
I gather this only works with Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard ?
$ dmd/osx/bin/dmd hello.d
Bus error
Could it be rebuilt with the MacOSX10.4u.sdk, perhaps ?
Is 10.5 really binary incompatible with
Extrawurst wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Now includes Mac OSX version!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.040.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.025.zip
Expect bugs. Thread local storage isn't
Walter Bright wrote:
Now includes Mac OSX version!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.040.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.025.zip
Expect bugs. Thread local storage isn't working on OSX, neither
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
This way won't really work because there are dozens of such a functions -
that's for virtual dispatch. I have just solved it by declaring functions
export extern (C) and adding _ prefix to function name when calling
GetProcAddress. So technically there are no
Michel Fortin wrote:
Is 10.5 really binary incompatible with 10.4 ?
It is compatible, unless you're using a new API or new linker features
which weren't available in 10.4.
Development on Mac OS X works by choosing a target SDK and a deployment
target version. Unless you want to use new
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:06, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
It's hard to see what that might be. dmd uses nothing but the generic linker
commands, in fact, it uses gcc to do the link. It also doesn't use any but
the basic api functions like read() and write().
When you link
Anders Bergh wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:06, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
It's hard to see what that might be. dmd uses nothing but the generic linker
commands, in fact, it uses gcc to do the link. It also doesn't use any but
the basic api functions like read() and
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 06:04, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Anders Bergh wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:06, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
It's hard to see what that might be. dmd uses nothing but the generic
linker
commands, in fact, it uses gcc to
Anders Bergh wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 06:04, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Anders Bergh wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:06, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
It's hard to see what that might be. dmd uses nothing but the generic
linker
commands, in fact,
Walter Bright wrote:
I suppose that explains the bus error. But I love this: The Firebird
build environment now uses both - just to make 100% certain. Blech.
Anyone know for sure? I hate randomly trying things.
Set both of them... They're for the same thing, but as with all
deprecation
17 matches
Mail list logo