bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
Using DMD 2.035 I have tried to compile:
void main() {}
Using:
dmd -X temp.d
And the compiler crashes.
Sorry, that happens if the source file doesn't have a module statement.
MIURA Masahiro wrote:
I have built QtD r304 (latest) with DMD
2.050,
Of course that's 2.035. I'm screwed by rapid releases :-)
(I do welcome rapid releases, though)
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
digited Wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
== Quote from digited (digi...@yandex.ru)'s article
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
digited Wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
zsxxsz Wrote:
I don't think so. If there are some important bugs fixed, the new release is
necessary without caring about the release date. With dmd.2.034, I don't event
compile druntime.
So you don't mind that Tango is still uncompilable with 1.050 because of
hurrying, for third release in
Walter Bright wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
digited wrote:
So you don't mind that Tango is still uncompilable with 1.050 because of
hurrying,
I didn't know that. The bugzilla number which was posted as the reason
it wouldn't compile was fixed.
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Should I create an enhancement for this?
Might as well.
Walter Bright Wrote:
digited wrote:
So you don't mind that Tango is still uncompilable with 1.050 because of
hurrying,
I didn't know that. The bugzilla number which was posted as the reason
it wouldn't compile was fixed.
I don't try to accuse you on anything, just ask to give the
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:46:25 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were
blocking QtD and Tango.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip
Walter Bright wrote:
Bugzilla 1534: Can't mix in a case statement.
Woo hoo!
Hi, I'm sorry to spam here with self references, but I don't know if
Walter and other D developers read Planet D, and I really appreciate if
they could read this blog post:
D and open development model: http://llucax.com.ar/blog/blog/post/6cac01e1
This tries to be a constructive criticism and a
bearophile, el 15 de octubre a las 17:49 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella:
I hope you find it useful.
Wonderful, baby steps lead you to many places :-)
Thank you for that post. Isn't GIT better for CVS?
Of course. Maybe you mistaken DVCS (Distributed Version Control System)
with CVS? I
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 15 de octubre a las 17:01 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Hi, I'm sorry to spam here with self references, but I don't know if
Walter and other D developers read Planet D, and I really appreciate if
they could read this blog post:
D and open development
Bill Baxter, el 15 de octubre a las 15:51 me escribiste:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Hi, I'm sorry to spam here with self references, but I don't know if
Walter and other D developers read Planet D,
17 matches
Mail list logo
