I'm back and will continue progressive ArcLib tinkering as I get the chance.
I'm not sure if SirAlaran will end up seeing this, but thanks for the awesome
work on the map editor:
http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4410start=15
Hopefully, some more interesting things will start going
This is the too many fixups bug?!
If so that's great news.
So is it any slower now with things not in ASM?
--bb
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Optlink is written entirely in rather impenetrable assembler code, and is
resistant to understanding
Bill Baxter wrote:
This is the too many fixups bug?!
If so that's great news.
Yah.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=424
Andrei
Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
Once Optlink is moved to C and than D, it could grow new features like
link-time optimizations.
It does open up a lot of possibilities.
One I think would be of big benefit is for two COMDATs with different
names, but the same contents, being merged.
Am I dreaming? This is too good to be true :O Walter, have you been
replaced by an alien or reprogrammed using some sci-fi device? I can't
believe the MsgBox of death is going away!
--
Tomasz Stachowiak
http://h3.team0xf.com/
h3/h3r3tic on #D freenode
On 03/11/2009 20:39, Walter Bright wrote:
Optlink is written entirely in rather impenetrable assembler code, and
is resistant to understanding and modification. Hence, over the last few
months I've been very slowly converting it to C, function by function.
One might ask, why not convert it to
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:hcptci$l0...@digitalmars.com...
[great optlink news]
That's great news!
Dear D community,
I would like to announce the latest release of ArcLib, Arc v.03
GUI-Physics-Refactor release. See
http://www.dsource.org/projects/arclib/report/6 for full list of work done on
this release.
The greatest changes were made to the structure of the project. Also includes
the
Yigal Chripun wrote:
Once Optlink is moved to C and than D, it could grow new
features like link-time optimizations.
It does open up a lot of possibilities.
One I think would be of big benefit is for two COMDATs with different
names, but the same contents, being merged. This would eliminate
On 04/11/2009 00:18, Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
Once Optlink is moved to C and than D, it could grow new features like
link-time optimizations.
It does open up a lot of possibilities.
One I think would be of big benefit is for two COMDATs with different
names, but the same
10 matches
Mail list logo
