Am 31.12.2009 19:48, schrieb Walter Bright:
Happy New Year!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.054.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.038.zip
Many thanks to the numerous people who contributed to
bearophile wrote:
Sönke Ludwig:
BTW: I was not really watching the newsgroups lately and just
noticed the DIP2/inout implementation. IMO 'inout' is really not a
good choice for the keyword, introducing a backwards
imcompatibility, changing the meaning of a de-facto standard
keyword (IDL etc)
Walter Bright:
And no, it was not random.
Sorry for showing disrespect for your work, it has slipped me. I have used a
wrong wording.
Do you see a correlation between the inout word and the semantics of this
feature? I think this connection is not intuitive.
What are the alternative words that
Don wrote:
That's also caused by the other half of the patch for 400, in class.c.
There's a patch up now for it.
Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 31.12.2009 19:48, schrieb Walter Bright:
Happy New Year!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.054.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.038.zip
Many thanks to the numerous
