In general good work!
But again phobos makes a simple std.string function unCTFEable.
Now I have to use an ugly hack to achieve something as simple as toUpper:
mixin( (){char[] tmp = dup; toUpperInPlace(tmp); return tmp;}() );
Good day,
our company is looking for a D1 programmer for a full time position at our
office in Berlin.
See the link for more details
http://www.sociomantic.com/careers/software-developer/
Regards,
--Mathias
--
Mathias Baumann
Research and Development
sociomantic labs GmbH
Now I have to use an ugly hack to achieve something as simple as
toUpper:
mixin( (){char[] tmp = dup; toUpperInPlace(tmp); return tmp;}() );
Damn i found that too and wanted to mention it in the dmd-beta list b4
release. But the workaround is simple. At least this one was fixed:
Jonathan M Davis, el 11 de julio a las 22:21 me escribiste:
On Tuesday 12 July 2011 01:28:11 Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Jonathan M Davis, el 11 de julio a las 18:15 me escribiste:
Despite the confusing non-standard descriptions in --help, -w is the
Treat warnings as errors setting, so it
On 2011-07-12 10:07, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Jonathan M Davis, el 11 de julio a las 22:21 me escribiste:
On Tuesday 12 July 2011 01:28:11 Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Jonathan M Davis, el 11 de julio a las 18:15 me escribiste:
Despite the confusing non-standard descriptions in --help, -w
On 2011-07-12 13:52, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Jonathan M Davis, el 12 de julio a las 18:12 me escribiste:
When a symbol has been deprecated, -d is required to compile any code
using that symbol. So, deprecation breaks code. You either have to
change your code so that it doesn't use
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Deprecating something is still going to break code
Breaking with deprecated is an entirely different kind of breakage
than removing something.
deprecated means simply please don't use this specific thing. You
can tell it shut up I know better than you and be on your way.
On 2011-07-12 16:52:10 -0400, Leandro Lucarella l...@llucax.com.ar said:
This is what deprecated is for! Removing stuff breaks code, not
deprecating stuff! Deprecated really is scheduled for removal, so
scheduled for deprecation is scheduled for scheduled for removal, it
makes no sense. Fix the
On 2011-07-12 15:09, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Deprecating something is still going to break code
Breaking with deprecated is an entirely different kind of breakage
than removing something.
deprecated means simply please don't use this specific thing. You
can tell it
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The current plan is that _everything_ which gets deprecated will
be removed.
What's the reason for removing things? Surely it's not disk space!
Anyway, let's look at the three categories. While I hate change,
there are two kinds of change: trivial and painful.
On 7/11/2011 8:31 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Walter, could you please add these to the changelog:
Done.
Thanks!
On Tuesday 12 July 2011 23:38:10 Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The current plan is that _everything_ which gets deprecated will
be removed.
What's the reason for removing things? Surely it's not disk space!
Anyway, let's look at the three categories. While I hate
13 matches
Mail list logo
