On 2011-10-18 06:52, SiegeLord wrote:
I just wanted to get the word out about a little project me and a few other
people been working on for the few past months, in case anyone feels like
helping out (or just as an FYI). This project is the D2 port of the Tango
framework library. You can read
On 2011-10-18 06:52, SiegeLord wrote:
I just wanted to get the word out about a little project me and a few other
people been working on for the few past months, in case anyone feels like
helping out (or just as an FYI). This project is the D2 port of the Tango
framework library. You can read
Good job.
The first project is a D2 port proper that tries to keep API semantics
This is the 'd2port' branch in my repository.
The second project is a more ambitious effort to rewrite some aspects
This is the 'master' branch in my repository.
Why isn't it the other way around?
Why? What's the point? Why not work on Phobos instead?
Well D1 projects could be ported to D2 much more easily, e.g. Yage.
Greate news. I wait for it for a long time.
Caligo Wrote:
Why? What's the point? Why not work on Phobos instead?
Aside from the obvious philosophical differences, which I am NOT going to get
into, porting D1 projects is an important reason.
-SiegeLord
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
Does this use druntime?
Yes, although a Tango specific runtime (compatible with druntime) will probably
be an option some day too. Still, right now you can safely use (modulo my
imperfect testing) Phobos and Tango modules together in a single program.
Do you have any
Trass3r Wrote:
Why isn't it the other way around?
Just a historical oddity.
-SiegeLord
18.10.2011 8:00, Caligo пишет:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:52 PM, SiegeLord n...@none.com
mailto:n...@none.com wrote:
I just wanted to get the word out about a little project me and a
few other people been working on for the few past months, in case
anyone feels like helping out
On 10/18/2011 12:52 AM, SiegeLord wrote:
I just wanted to get the word out about a little project me and a few other
people been working on for the few past months, in case anyone feels like
helping out (or just as an FYI). This project is the D2 port of the Tango
framework library. You can
On 10/18/2011 6:24 AM, Trass3r wrote:
Why? What's the point? Why not work on Phobos instead?
Well D1 projects could be ported to D2 much more easily, e.g. Yage.
True, but I had hoped to port Yage to phobos2 anyway. Lack of xml
support in phobos is the biggest reason I haven't started doing
I already mentioned this deeper down in the thread, but what are the
chances of being able to use tango as an add-on for phobos2? Something
from which I could pull in only the tango modules I need and use phobos
for the rest?
He already answered that:
SiegeLord Wrote:
Does this use
On 10/18/2011 12:45 PM, Trass3r wrote:
I already mentioned this deeper down in the thread, but what are the
chances of being able to use tango as an add-on for phobos2? Something
from which I could pull in only the tango modules I need and use
phobos for the rest?
He already answered that:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2011 10:27 Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
18.10.2011 8:00, Caligo пишет:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:52 PM, SiegeLord n...@none.com
mailto:n...@none.com wrote:
I just wanted to get the word out about a little project me and a
few other people been working on for the
Denis Shelomovskij Wrote:
+1 to Caligo. I agree that Tango is a good library (and was the best one
for D1) but, IMHO, porting it to D2 is a bad idea.
I'm the one who has a big D1+Tango project and I'd better rewrite it
with D2+Phobos, because:
0. I don't want to have a two standard
Eric Poggel (JoeCoder) Wrote:
Not quite. I was wondering if it can be done with ONLY bringing in what
I need, as apposed to most or all of tango.
One of Tango's philosophies was to minimize intermodule dependencies, something
that makes this porting effort a lot easier... still, those
On 10/18/2011 09:15 AM, SiegeLord wrote:
Caligo Wrote:
Why? What's the point? Why not work on Phobos instead?
Aside from the obvious philosophical differences, which I am NOT going to get
into, porting D1 projects is an important reason.
-SiegeLord
While I can see the desirability of
17 matches
Mail list logo
