Am 24.08.2012 20:37, schrieb Adam Wilson:
Despite an ambitious plan at the beginning of GSoC, Alex has made
phenomenal progress on Mono-D and has pushed Mono-D to the point that I
think that it can be considered a truly first-class IDE integration for
D. Some of the new capabilities that Mono-D a
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/23/12 9:27 PM, F i L wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
You've been mistaken. @system is the default.
If we could go back in time and redo things, we'd probably do
stuff
like make
pure and @safe the default, but it's far too late now.
Okay, thanks for the info.
nazriel:
But I moved it by hand, seems to be working good again.
Thank you.
I have seen that some times it "loses" the selections: if I
select a certain "Expiration" or "Others" I'd like it to keep the
same choice in my successive pastes in the same session.
Bye,
bearophile
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 23:18:45 +0200
"Minas Mina" wrote:
> Really nice (and fun) presentation! I wish I could've been there!
>
> And what's the deal with D3(?) guys?
Purely hypothetical talk right now. No real plans for a D3 ATM.
> Aren't you satisfied with D2?
One can never be satisfied :)
>
Really nice (and fun) presentation! I wish I could've been there!
And what's the deal with D3(?) guys?
Aren't you satisfied with D2? I think it rox baby!!
On Tuesday, 21 August 2012 at 23:17:42 UTC, bearophile wrote:
nazriel:
I would like to share with you, Beta version of
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/
At the moment gives a 403 error :-(
Bye,
bearophile
Yeah, our hosting provider had migration and due to specification
of dpaste, automatic migratio
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:43:24 +0200
"Kagamin" wrote:
> >Still other of our results contradict common beliefs: we find
> >significant developer unease with static type systems.
>
> Python/JS script kiddies?
And PHP monkeys.
Still other of our results contradict common beliefs: we find
significant developer unease with static type systems.
Python/JS script kiddies?
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:19:23 +0200
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote:
> It isn't surprising, but is still bizarre to me how many people
> correlated static types with some negative things like
> expressivity and enjoyment.
>
I agree. C++ and Java have damaged many minds.
> Static types rok so much in ev
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:49:02 +0200
"Peter Alexander" wrote:
>
> There's no such thing as a perfect language.
Well of course there isn't: D3 isn't made yet! ;)
Congrats Alex on all that hard work! MonoD has truly become a
first class citizen at last!
On 24-08-2012 20:49, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/24/12 2:44 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 24-Aug-12 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobo
Excellent work. Congratulations!
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:40 PM, nazriel wrote:
> Congratulations Alexander, as always, you did a great job!
>
On 8/24/12 2:06 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:40:27 -0700, Michal Minich
wrote:
http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/08/resharper-sdk-adventures-part-5-%E2%80%94-d-style-mixins-in-c/
This is pretty cool. The guys at JetBrains are well known in the C#
community for the high
On 8/24/12 2:44 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 24-Aug-12 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
This should have technically occurred during t
On 24-Aug-12 19:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,
but it's not like D
Congratulations Alexander, as always, you did a great job!
Despite an ambitious plan at the beginning of GSoC, Alex has made
phenomenal progress on Mono-D and has pushed Mono-D to the point that I
think that it can be considered a truly first-class IDE integration for D.
Some of the new capabilities that Mono-D acquired during GSoC are:
Template Pa
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:40:27 -0700, Michal Minich
wrote:
http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/08/resharper-sdk-adventures-part-5-%E2%80%94-d-style-mixins-in-c/
This is pretty cool. The guys at JetBrains are well known in the C#
community for the high-quality tools and state-of-the-art w
On Thursday, 23 August 2012 at 14:49:11 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 23-08-2012 16:47, dsimcha wrote:
On Thursday, 23 August 2012 at 14:38:19 UTC, Alex Rønne
Petersen wrote:
Yes, but parallelization of the mark phase is fairly trivial,
and
something we should probably look into.
Ironic
It isn't surprising, but is still bizarre to me how many people
correlated static types with some negative things like
expressivity and enjoyment.
Static types rok so much in every way.
Andrei Alexandrescu:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/yon3i/social_influences_on_language_adoption_pdf/
Some people on Lambda the Ultimate have criticized the quality of
the sources of the data, but despite those sources not looking
the best, I think the data is acceptable:
http
This good paper seems to be ignored on reddit. I think it's worth a look
particularly for us in a non-mainstream language community.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/yon3i/social_influences_on_language_adoption_pdf/
Andrei
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:50:37 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
This should have technically occurred during the allocated time its
Hi everybody,
I'm happy to announce that Dmitry has passed GSoC's final evaluation.
Going forward he and I will focus on integrating his work within Phobos.
This should have technically occurred during the allocated time itself,
but it's not like Dmitry will run away with the money :o).
Ple
On Friday, 24 August 2012 at 11:51:02 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
Oh, wow. My messages used to get blocked if I sent from the
wrong address,
perhaps it was a different list.
Thanks,
The forum.dlang engine has some spam checking, but I don't know
what it is and there are many other ways to post
On 8/24/12 12:35 AM, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
I like the plain jane look, and do not think it is unprofessional.
A part of me thinks the outlook of those slides is not
"shiny-professional", just compare your slides with the first and last
slides in that Pdf probably added by the confe
On 8/24/12 4:09 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/24/2012 12:00 AM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Friday, 24 August 2012 at 06:46:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/23/2012 11:34 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Will there be a video posted?
If not by now, probably not.
Was the talk mostly the same as the
On 8/23/12 9:27 PM, F i L wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
You've been mistaken. @system is the default.
If we could go back in time and redo things, we'd probably do stuff
like make
pure and @safe the default, but it's far too late now.
Okay, thanks for the info. I have a feeling that D3 will
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:44:55 +0100, Simen Kjaeraas
wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:52:04 +0200, F i L wrote:
Peter Alexander wrote:
There's no such thing as a perfect language.
Note the asterisks.
What I'm used to, *this* means bold. *Perfect* thus means absolutely
perfect.
Perfect*, o
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:52:04 +0200, F i L wrote:
Peter Alexander wrote:
There's no such thing as a perfect language.
Note the asterisks.
What I'm used to, *this* means bold. *Perfect* thus means absolutely
perfect.
Perfect*, on the other hand, would mean either 'more information below'
or
Peter Alexander wrote:
There's no such thing as a perfect language.
Note the asterisks.
Oh, wow. My messages used to get blocked if I sent from the wrong address,
perhaps it was a different list.
Thanks,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> On Friday, 24 August 2012 at 09:25:52 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
>
>> SPAM
>>
>> How did this message get approved?
>>
>>
>> On
On 2012-08-24 09:32, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
It certainly would be possible. But I believe it requires thread-local
heaps, and some way of keeping track of when an object changes owning
thread.
Yeah, I was think about that. Are thread local heaps a problem?
Perhaps a mark phase could run on ea
On Friday, 24 August 2012 at 09:25:52 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
SPAM
How did this message get approved?
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Lena Singh
wrote:
How to make a chat page in php in simple?
For more PHP interview questions and answers visit
http://www.coolinterview.com/**type.asp
Le 23/08/2012 22:45, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
Voted hot!
http://sioux.eu/en/hot-or-not/d-programming-language.html
Andrei
Should I mention that thing about segfault ?
On Friday, 24 August 2012 at 02:23:04 UTC, F i L wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Well, since it'll be years before we even consider creating
D3, we're in
trouble if we need D3 for D to be successful. D2 isn't
perfect, but it's still
a very solid language and outshines more entrenched languages
On Friday, 24 August 2012 at 02:40:43 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:18:25 +0200
"alex" wrote:
class D : C!(A!int.SubClass) { } // is not allowed, but A!int
is -- why?
IIRC, I've had problems doing anything complex in a no-paren
template
parameter. I always figured if
On Friday, 24 August 2012 at 00:10:03 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
F i L wrote:
http://i3.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/004/128/BRILLIANT_.jpg
Great work as always, Alex :D
Yes! This is really good project! :)
Thanks :D
How to make a chat page in php in simple?
For more PHP interview questions and answers visit
http://www.coolinterview.com/type.asp?iType=110
http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/08/resharper-sdk-adventures-part-5-%E2%80%94-d-style-mixins-in-c/
On 8/24/2012 12:00 AM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
On Friday, 24 August 2012 at 06:46:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/23/2012 11:34 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Will there be a video posted?
If not by now, probably not.
Was the talk mostly the same as the other one you gave
with the same slides? (
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:27:09 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-08-23 16:38, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Yes, but parallelization of the mark phase is fairly trivial, and
something we should probably look into.
The GC will probably always be STW unless we get compiler support for
inserting
On Thursday, 23 August 2012 at 14:38:19 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 23-08-2012 15:21, Rory McGuire wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:51 PM, dsimcha mailto:dsim...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
Basically, the idea is to store information about what is
and isn't
a pointer at the pool level inst
On Friday, 24 August 2012 at 06:46:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/23/2012 11:34 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Will there be a video posted?
If not by now, probably not.
Was the talk mostly the same as the other one you gave
with the same slides? (forget where that was)
IIRC, I've had problems doing anything complex in a no-paren
template
parameter. I always figured if you're doing no-parens, it had
to be a
single token (Maybe I'm wrong?). Does it work if you do this?:
A!(int.SubClass)
primitive or identifier, iirc
46 matches
Mail list logo
