Re: HibernateD and DDBC - ORM and DB abstraction layer for D
On Friday, 5 April 2013 at 17:18:01 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 5 April 2013 at 16:41:53 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
I'm iterating through class members using __traits(allMembers,
T), then accessing member using _traits(getMember,T,memberName)
I'm not sure which one of the members with the same name will
be returned by getMember... Property getter and setter have
the same name...
Is there any better way to iterate through members of class?
Quoting vibe.d again :)
---
foreach( member; __traits(allMembers, T) ) {
foreach( overload; MemberFunctionsTuple!(T, method) ) {
---
Fixed property support.
Re: Guigle openGL GUI on GIT
On Saturday, 6 April 2013 at 21:42:40 UTC, azertopia wrote: On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 23:04:05 UTC, Stephen Jones wrote: https://github.com/Ste3e/Guigle/ is the link. The wiki has been written. If it is not viewable it will be that I have done something wrong, or have not done something I should with GIT... it is new to me. I was thinking there may be a problem getting Guigle running on Linux and Mac insofar as I use pragma(lib, ...) to load the native Window .dll and there is no compatible code for Linux/Mac. But if you already know the code then it is simply a matter of adding it to the Form.d file where the pragmas are. There is a general problem to do with the dlls themselves. While Derelict3 compiles its own .lib files they still require native .dll files on the path. For openGL it is not an issue but for SDL2, SDL2_Image and SDL_ttf there is a problem. Does anyone know either a repository with viable dll (and whatever linux/Mac require), or a clear explanation of the process required to build your own from SDL2 source. This is a nice project but you need to consider how it's maintainable for someone who will use it. You can't built a house with doors and windows without the basis. (I've seen that there is a lot of UI element already)... I don't understand the comment, what basis do you mean? Do you mean where is the assurance that the programming interface will not change which would upset backward compatibility?
Re: HibernateD and DDBC - ORM and DB abstraction layer for D
On Saturday, 6 April 2013 at 12:50:19 UTC, Suliman wrote: Because people want standards. For example people want GUI for D, but most of the people agree that it would bad idea to create 10 different GUIs, and it's better have one official GUI. Look at .NET it's include most of things that developers need at real life. And it's one of reasons of it's popularity. At the same time, it's good to have some competition and alternative choices. For example, Ruby on Rails is the de facto standard for Ruby Web applications, but there are alternatives (and pretty decent ones at that). That's why I'm continuing to work on my own ORM library, which should still have a niche in SQLite-based applications because its API is designed to be lightweight and lazy.
Re: We have completed our GSoC 2013 application
Unfortunately our application to GSoC 2013 has been rejected. The list of accepted organization is at https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/accepted_orgs/google/gsoc2013. We will consider applying again to GSoC in the future. This is of course not the outcome we were hoping for, but not a major setback. Going forward let's continue ramping up work on improving the quality of implementation and the language definition. Andrei
Re: We have completed our GSoC 2013 application
On Monday, 8 April 2013 at 22:55:28 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Unfortunately our application to GSoC 2013 has been rejected. The list of accepted organization is at https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/accepted_orgs/google/gsoc2013. We will consider applying again to GSoC in the future. This is of course not the outcome we were hoping for, but not a major setback. Going forward let's continue ramping up work on improving the quality of implementation and the language definition. Andrei Do we know why it was rejected? Because if we can find out we might be able to work on those issues.
Re: We have completed our GSoC 2013 application
On 4/8/2013 9:49 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote: Do we know why it was rejected? Because if we can find out we might be able to work on those issues. We don't know why.
