On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 09:36 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 06/01/2013 02:31 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 13:50 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
just tried it on ubuntu 12.10, and it does the same.
are you using -defaultlib=libphobos2.so
I suspect I may be doing
Looks good. Definitely will try.
Am Sun, 2 Jun 2013 07:40:27 +0200
schrieb Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de:
For some reason I still cannot build dmd 2.063 from the zip
release. I mentioned it before the release on the beta and
internals mailing lists and maybe I'm just overlooking
something trivial, but when I run make I get:
On 2013-06-02 00:49, Adam Wilson wrote:
Indeed, but since I was comparing to vanilla C# 4.0 and .NET I figured
it was only fair to compare to DMD 2.062 and Phobos. Once you start
comparing and contrasting third party libraries the scope of the topic
quickly balloons in size. The biggest problem
On 2013-06-01 23:11, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
There are quite a few things that Phobos is still missing, but this isn't one
of them. We have std.datetime.StopWatch (which will probably end up in
std.benchmark when that's finally complete).
I haven't looked in std.datetime lately but I though I
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:23 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
who packages your dmd?
Normally I would use the one from APT-D, but as this not at 2.063 as yet
I used the deb downloaded from the D download page. This necessitates
removing all packages from APT-D since they depend on exactly a
I know someone here was asking about my simpledisplay.d on 64 bit
a while ago.. I don't remember who so here's a general
announcement.
I got it working for at least the parts I tried (display image,
get keyboard input) compiled with -m64:
On 06/02/2013 11:48 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:23 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
who packages your dmd?
Normally I would use the one from APT-D, but as this not at 2.063 as yet
I used the deb downloaded from the D download page. This necessitates
removing all
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 12:48 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
so we are using the same package.
??
oh. dpkg -L just doesn't list it.
Symbolic links aren't in the deb, they are created by the post install
script once the shared library is installed.
but it's definitely missing from the
On 06/02/2013 12:56 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 12:48 -0700, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
[…]
so we are using the same package.
??
oh. dpkg -L just doesn't list it.
Symbolic links aren't in the deb, they are created by the post install
script once the shared library is
On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 02:34:39 -0700, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-06-02 00:49, Adam Wilson wrote:
Indeed, but since I was comparing to vanilla C# 4.0 and .NET I figured
it was only fair to compare to DMD 2.062 and Phobos. Once you start
comparing and contrasting third party
On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 02:35:37 -0700, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-06-01 23:11, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
There are quite a few things that Phobos is still missing, but this
isn't one
of them. We have std.datetime.StopWatch (which will probably end up in
std.benchmark when that's
I'm sorry to hear that you ran into the unsigned long problem.
I noticed it in time and asked about it on the NG and was told
that the difference is between Windows and Posix. One takes
long as int32, the other as the native machine word size on
64-bit. We do the same stupid mistakes over and
On 6/2/13, Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de wrote:
I'm sorry to hear that you ran into the unsigned long problem.
This is why we have core.std.config:
import core.stdc.config : c_long, c_ulong;
This is awesome! I'm sure I speak on behalf of the entire
community that we'd be happy to help with anything you need.
There is, perhaps, a need for a short technical document bringing
TDPL up to date, i.e. consistent with the currently accepted view
of the definition of D (wherever that
On Monday, June 03, 2013 00:29:09 Carl Sturtivant wrote:
This is awesome! I'm sure I speak on behalf of the entire
community that we'd be happy to help with anything you need.
There is, perhaps, a need for a short technical document bringing
TDPL up to date, i.e. consistent with the
On Sunday, 2 June 2013 at 22:16:57 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
This is why we have core.std.config:
import core.stdc.config : c_long, c_ulong;
I would never have thought to look in config for types! Well,
hopefully I'll remember for next time.
On Sunday, 2 June 2013 at 21:53:56 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Also eventually we should generate X bindings for all
platforms (including Windows) from the XML definitions like
XCB does.
hmm I don't see an xml file for Xlib.h on my system, do you know
if there is supposed to be one? Though I'm
Andrej Mitrovic:
This is why we have core.std.config:
import core.stdc.config : c_long, c_ulong;
Why isn't that linked in this page?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_stdint.html
I'd like to open a little documentation enhancement request for
that.
Bye,
bearophile
On 6/2/13 7:10 PM, bearophile wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic:
This is why we have core.std.config:
import core.stdc.config : c_long, c_ulong;
Why isn't that linked in this page?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_stdint.html
I'd like to open a little documentation enhancement request for that.
Bye,
Why isn't that linked in this page?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_stdint.html
It seems it lacks some of them, this gives an import error:
import core.stdc.config: c_ulonglong, c_longlong;
Bye,
bearophile
On Sunday, 2 June 2013 at 23:19:18 UTC, bearophile wrote:
It seems it lacks some of them, this gives an import error:
It only defines c_long and c_ulong. I guess this is ok because
the other types don't vary, though I kinda think it should do
them all just so you can be consistent.
Not
Andrei Alexandrescu:
And while you are at it, please also contribute the
corresponding pull request. Time to inaugurate bearophile's
additions!
As my friend, please understand, I can't afford to get addicted
to that :-)
Hugs,
bearophile
On 6/3/13, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Why isn't that linked in this page?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_stdint.html
Because it's on this page:
http://dlang.org/interfaceToC.html
It seems it lacks some of them, this gives an import error:
import core.stdc.config: c_ulonglong,
On Sunday, 2 June 2013 at 23:35:28 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
http://dlang.org/interfaceToC.html
ah then what is this page doing there?
http://dlang.org/htomodule.html
The documentation could def use a lil cleanup.
Andrej Mitrovic:
Because it's on this page:
http://dlang.org/interfaceToC.html
It seems it lacks some of them, this gives an import error:
import core.stdc.config: c_ulonglong, c_longlong;
Again see http://dlang.org/interfaceToC.html
Good, thank you. I missed that.
Bye,
bearophile
On 6/3/13, Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 2 June 2013 at 23:35:28 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
http://dlang.org/interfaceToC.html
ah then what is this page doing there?
http://dlang.org/htomodule.html
The documentation could def use a lil cleanup.
There's a
Am Mon, 03 Jun 2013 01:02:12 +0200
schrieb Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com:
On Sunday, 2 June 2013 at 21:53:56 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Also eventually we should generate X bindings for all
platforms (including Windows) from the XML definitions like
XCB does.
hmm I don't see an
Maybe stuff added to the language? User-defined attributes, for instance.
LMB
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Monday, June 03, 2013 00:29:09 Carl Sturtivant wrote:
This is awesome! I'm sure I speak on behalf of the entire
community that we'd be
On Sunday, June 02, 2013 21:56:30 Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
Maybe stuff added to the language? User-defined attributes, for instance.
Sure, there's stuff that TDPL doesn't describe, but TDPL never described
everything (for instance, it doesn't go into a detailed explanation of the
various
On Monday, 3 June 2013 at 00:15:20 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
all the remote procedure calls to the X Server. Internally
those calls rely on a small generic set of functions that
serializes the requests for transmission.
I see. I just skimmed an xcb tutorial and it isn't all that
different than
31 matches
Mail list logo
