Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2
On 31.07.2015 02:41, Joseph Cassman wrote: Not sure if it ties in with DMD or not but a libucrt.lib missing error was one of the several errors I got when trying to use VS2015 with DMD + Win64. I do not get the error with VS2013u5 (the file exists with both installations but is only recognized for the later for some reason). Posting in case it helps isolate the issue for VisualD as well. Joseph I just updated my VS2015 installation and can confirm the error message regarding libucrt.lib. I found the library in the folder c:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\10\Lib\10.0.10150.0\ucrt\x64. You can add it to the library search paths in Tools-Options-Projects and Solutions-Visual D-DMD Directories-x64. Unfortunately, that does not help a lot because Microsoft changed their C runtime quite a bit to make it more compliant to C99. This causes unresolved symbols when linking phobos.
Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2
On 02.08.2015 11:38, Martin Nowak wrote: On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 09:24:09 UTC, John Colvin wrote: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=46886 Does it include the C++ compiler and linker? No, the VS shell does not include any specific language support and libraries.
Re: Russian-speaking community
On Tuesday, 30 June 2015 at 20:39:38 UTC, lomereiter wrote: (whose domain is much easier to remember, btw) We have already moved to http://dlanguage.ru
Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2
On Sunday, 2 August 2015 at 09:38:23 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 09:24:09 UTC, John Colvin wrote: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=46886 Does it include the C++ compiler and linker? I think it contains a linker, but I'm not 100% sure. See https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb129445.aspx for some info
Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 17:56:23 UTC, Kelet wrote: Hi Gerald, MonoTime is the replacement for TickDuration and it's initialized from the runtime initialization function (rt_init). This is because the GC and others may need time functionality. Thanks, filed as https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14863.
Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b2
On 31.07.2015 09:54, Kagamin wrote: On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 18:54:03 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote: That was fast. Thanks! README in github repo still has some outdated links to dsource. Also bugzilla address is https://issues.dlang.org/ I removed most dsource links (also from the documentation), but some are still valid and not available elsewhere (e.g. download links of files only found there). I didn't immediately get what you meant with the bugzilla address because it worked due to redirection. I'll update that later...
Re: Beta D 2.068.0-b1
On Sunday, 26 July 2015 at 12:00:09 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Could someone please try the fix https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14801#c2. Please try again, we updated the fix. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14801#c11
Re: SDLang-D v0.9.2
On 8/1/15 1:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: On Saturday, 1 August 2015 at 20:14:52 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: On Saturday, 1 August 2015 at 17:57:30 UTC, John Colvin wrote: Haven't looked at this at all really, just a quick question: Are there straightforward library calls or command line utilities for converting between the shared subset of json and SDL? No, but there definitely should be. I'll post a ticket so I don't forget. https://github.com/Abscissa/SDLang-D/issues/30 Without having looked at the library, perhaps this util would make some good sample code.
Re: Russian-speaking community
On Sunday, 2 August 2015 at 12:11:03 UTC, Majestio wrote: On Tuesday, 30 June 2015 at 20:39:38 UTC, lomereiter wrote: (whose domain is much easier to remember, btw) We have already moved to http://dlanguage.ru Sorry for long reviving of http://dlang.ru but we almost end work at it's engine. Now you may see, that it's become very fast. I hope that it will will be open on next week. All *major* bugs are fixed. There is only minors, about most of them I know. Please do not start using it until I get approve from CMS developer. Also I have plan to revive dsource.org on our CMS. It's very powerful, and can be used as collective forum and blog. So When we will test it, I will try to contact with dsource admins and suggest them to move site to our CMS. Also if anybody want to help, you may help with site design.
London D meetups ...
Hi All, I've just been in touch with Kingsley Hendrickse who's unfortunately not going to have time to organise the London D Programmer meetups in the future. Which is a real shame - I only attended one of the two meetups but I was quite impressed with the calibre of people that turned up, and Kinglsey did a great job of organising it :-) I'd really hate for this initiative to die off just as it was getting going. So I thought I'd just ping the London community and see if there was any appetite for anyone to pick up the baton, so to speak. Normally I'd just say I'll do it but I'm on the verge of beginning a new job (literally starting tomorrow!), so I need to wait until I'm achieved some sort of equilibrium there before I commit to anything else. One thought I had was maybe a 'rolling' organiser would make sense? Committing to organising one meetup is a far less onerous commitment than becoming a full fledged card-carrying organiser so maybe that would make sense?! I'd quite happily commit to organising one meetup if there was a rotating quorum of organisers willing to step up. ( Probably wouldn't do any harm to the old linked-in profile :-) ). Anyway lets know your thoughts. The meetup group 'dies' on 17th August unless someone else steps up - hopefully that won't happen :-) Cheers, Andy.
Seattle D meetup
Seeing the threads on London, Silicon Valley and Berlin meetups, is there any interest for a Seattle one?
Re: Seattle D meetup
On Sunday, 2 August 2015 at 22:53:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: Seeing the threads on London, Silicon Valley and Berlin meetups, is there any interest for a Seattle one? btw, the Silicon Valley Meetup doesn't show up on this nice little worldwide map of Dlang Meetups on their website: http://dpl.meetup.com/ Maybe Ali or some other organizer needs to add the appropriate tag to their Meetup so it will? Would be cool if we could have a nicely populated Meetup map to show off on dlang.org somewhere.
Re: London D meetups ...
On Sunday, 2 August 2015 at 19:01:56 UTC, Andy Smith wrote: Hi All, I've just been in touch with Kingsley Hendrickse who's unfortunately not going to have time to organise the London D Programmer meetups in the future. Which is a real shame - I only attended one of the two meetups but I was quite impressed with the calibre of people that turned up, and Kinglsey did a great job of organising it :-) I'd really hate for this initiative to die off just as it was getting going. So I thought I'd just ping the London community and see if there was any appetite for anyone to pick up the baton, so to speak. Normally I'd just say I'll do it but I'm on the verge of beginning a new job (literally starting tomorrow!), so I need to wait until I'm achieved some sort of equilibrium there before I commit to anything else. One thought I had was maybe a 'rolling' organiser would make sense? Committing to organising one meetup is a far less onerous commitment than becoming a full fledged card-carrying organiser so maybe that would make sense?! I'd quite happily commit to organising one meetup if there was a rotating quorum of organisers willing to step up. ( Probably wouldn't do any harm to the old linked-in profile :-) ). Anyway lets know your thoughts. The meetup group 'dies' on 17th August unless someone else steps up - hopefully that won't happen :-) Cheers, Andy. Hi Andy. Kingsley did a great job, but it's a tough thing to keep going as professional and personal demands increase. It's important for D to have a presence in London, and being more involved probably pays for itself careerwise in the end, one way or the other. We should definitely strive to keep things going. I can't do much the next few weeks, and can't make a firm regular commitment as it's hard to predict other demands. But if it's needed I will definitely do one, and try to do so again from time to time. Laeeth.
