Re: pl0stuff an optimizing pl0 > c transcompiler

On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 04:37:44 UTC, Nick B wrote: Would you know what is required to get good performance ? I can guess. However without actually implementing it my guess is as good as any. I would probably look at HHVM, and see what is easy to reimplement in D.

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 14:26:48 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: Okay, I remember you saying something a bit different on IRC (at least to my understanding). Well, I'm still a bit iffy on it, to attach a name I used the first member of the enum which might not pass review muster in dmd

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

On 12/29/2015 10:20 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 14:26:48 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: Okay, I remember you saying something a bit different on IRC (at least to my understanding). Well, I'm still a bit iffy on it, to attach a name I used the first member of the

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

On 30/12/15 1:32 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 12/29/2015 10:20 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 14:26:48 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: Okay, I remember you saying something a bit different on IRC (at least to my understanding). Well, I'm still a bit iffy on it, to

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

On Wednesday, 30 December 2015 at 00:32:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Then why document it? Just on principle, a documentation tool probably shouldn't be limiting the author's ability to document... This might just be a bug in dmd btw. Looking at the ddoc spec page, it says

Re: pl0stuff an optimizing pl0 > c transcompiler

On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 17:59:15 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 04:37:44 UTC, Nick B wrote: Would you know what is required to get good performance ? I can guess. However without actually implementing it my guess is as good as any. I would probably look at

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

On 12/29/2015 09:09 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Putting one item per page is far more important than I even realized before getting into this. We already have that: https://dlang.org/library/std/array/join.html If I search for dlang array join that the third hit on google if I'm logged in, and

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

Jacob Carlborg writes: > On 2015-12-28 20:02, Dan Olson wrote: > >> That is Plan B.2 > > I'm working on implementing native TLS for OS X in DMD. I think I've > figured out how everything works. Unless you already know how it > works, I could tell you what I have figured out. I know

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 05:00:48 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: From what Adam has said, definitely won't be happening with DDOC. There is simply no symbol to attach the comment to. Well, not definitely, it was really easy to do in libdparse (a two line diff) and probably similarly

Re: Better watch out! D runs on watchOS!

On 2015-12-28 20:02, Dan Olson wrote: That is Plan B.2 I'm working on implementing native TLS for OS X in DMD. I think I've figured out how everything works. Unless you already know how it works, I could tell you what I have figured out. -- /Jacob Carlborg

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

On 30/12/15 3:24 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 05:00:48 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: From what Adam has said, definitely won't be happening with DDOC. There is simply no symbol to attach the comment to. Well, not definitely, it was really easy to do in libdparse (a