Re: Beta D 2.070.0-b2

2016-01-18 Thread Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:58:46 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> The TypeTuple disappearance issue is still there. Should at least be >> marked deprecated first. Right? >>

Re: Beta D 2.070.0-b2

2016-01-18 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 00:33:11 UTC, Andrei Amatuni wrote: Changelog doesn't include ndslice. Wasn't it merged for the 2.070 release? Fixed, I simply forgot to update the changelog from phobos.

Re: Beta D 2.070.0-b2

2016-01-18 Thread deadalnix via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 17 January 2016 at 20:52:20 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Second and last beta for the 2.070.0 release. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.070.0.html Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -Martin

Re: Beta D 2.070.0-b2

2016-01-18 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:58:46 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: The TypeTuple disappearance issue is still there. Should at least be marked deprecated first. Right? It didn't disappear, std.typetuple is still there and deprecated. What I found during testing was an incorrect `import std.range

Re: LDC 0.17.0-beta1 has been released!

2016-01-18 Thread Adrian Matoga via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 20:33:30 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote: LDC 0.17.0-beta1, the LLVM-based D compiler, is available for download! This release is based on the 2.068.2 frontend and standard library and supports LLVM 3.5-3.7. Excellent! Works great so far (Linux x86_64). Any chance of

Re: Logo for D

2016-01-18 Thread Adrian Matoga via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:28:48 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote: On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote: How do you see it? http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png Many variants are on the way. The current logo is very good and there is value

Re: Logo for D

2016-01-18 Thread Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote: How do you see it? http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png Many variants are on the way. The current logo is very good and there is value in keeping it. Now if it didn't have this extremely 90s-looking

Re: LDC 0.17.0-beta1 has been released!

2016-01-18 Thread Dan Olson via Digitalmars-d-announce
Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce writes: > > Love your work guys! Thanks for keeping at it. > > One question though, what's the plan for moving to DMD latest? Both > LDC and GDC seem to be quite behind at the moment. > My current project is depending on

Re: Beta D 2.070.0-b2

2016-01-18 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:08:51 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: What I meant was it used to be available by importing std.typecons and now it isn't. There is a library on code.dlang.org that uses it, painlessjson I think it was. That's what I meant above, thought it was std.range. TypeTuple

Re: Beta D 2.070.0-b2

2016-01-18 Thread Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Andrei Amatuni via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Sunday, 17 January 2016 at 20:52:20 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: > >> Second and last beta for the 2.070.0 release. >> >> http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta >>

Re: LDC 0.17.0-beta1 has been released!

2016-01-18 Thread Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 15 January 2016 at 06:33, Kai Nacke via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > Hi everyone, > > LDC 0.17.0-beta1, the LLVM-based D compiler, is available for download! > This release is based on the 2.068.2 frontend and standard library and > supports LLVM

Re: LDC 0.17.0-beta1 has been released!

2016-01-18 Thread tsbockman via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:47:07 UTC, Manu wrote: Love your work guys! Thanks for keeping at it. One question though, what's the plan for moving to DMD latest? Both LDC and GDC seem to be quite behind at the moment. My current project is depending on bug-fixes patched in by Walter in

Re: Logo for D

2016-01-18 Thread Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:01:08 +, Marc Schütz wrote: > On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote: >> How do you see it? >> >> http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png >> >> Many variants are on the way. > > This URL redirects me to that Google page: >

Re: D is now catching C++ exceptions!

2016-01-18 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 1/18/2016 8:03 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: Nice work! Although I've never used C++ exceptions (or D exceptions) personally. Is there a roadmap for this stuff I can check out? Short list of upcoming C++ work? Since you're at the bleeding edge of interfacing to C++, I'd say

Re: Logo for D

2016-01-18 Thread DaveG via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 22:48:52 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote: On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:28:48 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote: On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote: How do you see it? http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png Many variants

Re: D is now catching C++ exceptions!

2016-01-18 Thread Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 19 January 2016 at 08:26, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > at least for 64 bit Linux. Other platforms to follow. > > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/5342 > > This is what Andrei and I call "enabling" technology, as it

D is now catching C++ exceptions!

2016-01-18 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
at least for 64 bit Linux. Other platforms to follow. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/5342 This is what Andrei and I call "enabling" technology, as it opens the door for many more uses of D, in this case better interoperability with existing C++ codebases. Thanks to

Re: Logo for D

2016-01-18 Thread Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 22:48:52 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote: Doesn't it look so much better: http://i.imgur.com/QlrbCou.png It does.

Re: Logo for D

2016-01-18 Thread Brad Anderson via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:28:48 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote: On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 17:55:13 UTC, karabuta wrote: How do you see it? http://amazingws.0fees.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dlang2.png Many variants are on the way. The current logo is very good and there is value