Re: Getters/setters generator
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 10:27:05 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
Hello,
we've just open sourced a small module ("accessors") that helps
to generate getters and setters automatically:
https://github.com/funkwerk/accessors
http://code.dlang.org/packages/accessors
It takes advantage of the UDAs and mixins. A simple example
would be:
import accessors;
class WithAccessors
{
@Read @Write
private int num_;
mixin(GenerateFieldAccessors);
}
It would generate 2 methods "num": one to set num_ and one to
get its value. Of cause you can generate only @Read without
@Write and vice versa. There are some more features, you can
find the full documentation in the README.
"GenerateFieldAccessors" mixin should be added into each
class/struct that wants to use auto generated accessors.
Oh my this is going to be a compiletime hog if used excessively.
Due the use of fqn.
Re: Getters/setters generator
On 12/9/16 5:27 AM, Eugene Wissner wrote:
Hello,
we've just open sourced a small module ("accessors") that helps to
generate getters and setters automatically:
https://github.com/funkwerk/accessors
http://code.dlang.org/packages/accessors
It takes advantage of the UDAs and mixins. A simple example would be:
import accessors;
class WithAccessors
{
@Read @Write
private int num_;
mixin(GenerateFieldAccessors);
}
It would generate 2 methods "num": one to set num_ and one to get its
value. Of cause you can generate only @Read without @Write and vice
versa. There are some more features, you can find the full documentation
in the README.
"GenerateFieldAccessors" mixin should be added into each class/struct
that wants to use auto generated accessors.
Love it, and was toying with similar ideas too. One good extension is to
add a predicate to the setter, which guards the assignment. -- Andrei
Re: Getters/setters generator
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 12:37:58 UTC, Iakh wrote: Is there possibility to remove affixes in generated accessor names? No, there is no way to manipulate the accessor names. What affixes do you mean?
Re: Getters/setters generator
mixin template GenerateFieldAccessorMethods()
{
static enum GenerateFieldAccessorMethods()
{
string result = "";
return result;
}
}
Strange syntax
Re: Getters/setters generator
On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 10:27:05 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
Hello,
we've just open sourced a small module ("accessors") that helps
to generate getters and setters automatically:
https://github.com/funkwerk/accessors
http://code.dlang.org/packages/accessors
It takes advantage of the UDAs and mixins. A simple example
would be:
import accessors;
class WithAccessors
{
@Read @Write
private int num_;
mixin(GenerateFieldAccessors);
}
It would generate 2 methods "num": one to set num_ and one to
get its value. Of cause you can generate only @Read without
@Write and vice versa. There are some more features, you can
find the full documentation in the README.
"GenerateFieldAccessors" mixin should be added into each
class/struct that wants to use auto generated accessors.
Is there possibility to remove affixes in generated accessor
names?
Getters/setters generator
Hello,
we've just open sourced a small module ("accessors") that helps
to generate getters and setters automatically:
https://github.com/funkwerk/accessors
http://code.dlang.org/packages/accessors
It takes advantage of the UDAs and mixins. A simple example would
be:
import accessors;
class WithAccessors
{
@Read @Write
private int num_;
mixin(GenerateFieldAccessors);
}
It would generate 2 methods "num": one to set num_ and one to get
its value. Of cause you can generate only @Read without @Write
and vice versa. There are some more features, you can find the
full documentation in the README.
"GenerateFieldAccessors" mixin should be added into each
class/struct that wants to use auto generated accessors.
