Re: Release D 2.076.0
This is the first time I'm trying to install with the install script as shown on the download page but it fails. $ curl -fsS https://dlang.org/install.sh | bash -s dmd Downloading and unpacking http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2.x/2.076.0/dmd.2.076.0.linux.tar.xz 100.0% Invalid signature http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2.x/2.076.0/dmd.2.076.0.linux.tar.xz.sig Am I using it correctly? Ali
Re: From the D Blog: The Evolution of the accessors Library
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 18:11:28 UTC, Joakim wrote: - There's no resolution to the Flag type issue: you should say whether you filed a bug, as you did with the issue in the private classes section, or if you were able to work around it. We asked in the forum whether this is a bug: https://forum.dlang.org/thread/igsxmowtguwvngnqu...@forum.dlang.org The answer was ... inconclusive. So, we worked around the problem: https://github.com/funkwerk/accessors/blob/master/src/accessors.d#L223
Re: Hong Kong dlang Meetup
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 00:48:07 UTC, Lionello Lunesu wrote: Let's occupy codeaholics: https://www.meetup.com/Codeaholics/events/242640432/ Good idea. I'll be there :)
Re: From the D Blog: The Evolution of the accessors Library
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 13:32:14 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Ronny Spiegel from Funkwerk has written an article for the D Blog describing the background of the company's open source accessors library & how it works. accessors can be used to automatically generate property getters & setters. Blog: https://dlang.org/blog/2017/09/06/the-evolution-of-the-accessors-library/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/6yfm6y/accessors_is_an_open_source_library_for/ Nice post, interesting usage. Some edits: - "That true" -> "That's true" - add two commas: "accessible annotations, similar to UDAs (User-Defined Attributes) were" -> "accessible, annotations, similar to UDAs (User-Defined Attributes), were" - There's no resolution to the Flag type issue: you should say whether you filed a bug, as you did with the issue in the private classes section, or if you were able to work around it.
Re: D on Tiobe Index
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 11:14:00 UTC, Maksim Fomin wrote: On Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 16:37:35 UTC, SrMordred wrote: On Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 14:57:28 UTC, bitwise wrote: https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/d/ What happened in 2009? My guess is constant random methodology changes. I was tracking TIOBE index each month from 2011 till 2016. I remember they announced changes in methodology in title page approximately once per 3-4 months. For example, changing the base from 100% to sum of percentages of all languages(<100%) increased reported % of each language. Taking this into account means that changes in particular month tells nothing. The trend is, however, positive: in 2014-2017 years D stands higher than in 2011-2014 (if you have faith in TIOBE averages). I see sometimes positive discussions about D at completely unexpected local tech sites. That was my thinking too. A real dip as large as what's shown on the graph for 2009 would probably take 3-4 large companies that use D randomly shutting down in perfect unison - highly unlikely. I think that if the glitch were removed, what would remain would be a nice steady upward slope.
Re: D on Tiobe Index
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 10:45:48 UTC, Basile B. wrote: And now ? Just tried. Last version (3 update 4) works well.
From the D Blog: The Evolution of the accessors Library
Ronny Spiegel from Funkwerk has written an article for the D Blog describing the background of the company's open source accessors library & how it works. accessors can be used to automatically generate property getters & setters. Blog: https://dlang.org/blog/2017/09/06/the-evolution-of-the-accessors-library/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/6yfm6y/accessors_is_an_open_source_library_for/
Re: D on Tiobe Index
On Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 16:37:35 UTC, SrMordred wrote: On Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 14:57:28 UTC, bitwise wrote: https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/d/ What happened in 2009? My guess is constant random methodology changes. I was tracking TIOBE index each month from 2011 till 2016. I remember they announced changes in methodology in title page approximately once per 3-4 months. For example, changing the base from 100% to sum of percentages of all languages(<100%) increased reported % of each language. Taking this into account means that changes in particular month tells nothing. The trend is, however, positive: in 2014-2017 years D stands higher than in 2011-2014 (if you have faith in TIOBE averages). I see sometimes positive discussions about D at completely unexpected local tech sites. Although D's position becomes higher in TIOBE, I don't see progress in other statistics, for example in github.
Re: D on Tiobe Index
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 10:45:48 UTC, Basile B. wrote: And now ? I'll check later today.
Re: D on Tiobe Index
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 09:57:24 UTC, Dmitry wrote: Tried Coedit some times. It just doesn't start on my old laptop with Linux Mint. And now ?
Re: D on Tiobe Index
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 19:31:07 UTC, dukc wrote: Other good canditate is BBasile's CoEdit. It's very much like DLangIDE in that it has roughly the same feature set, at least according to readme. It is also very actively maintained like your project. But it has the disadvantage of being written in Pascal. Tried Coedit some times. It just doesn't start on my old laptop with Linux Mint.
