On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 05:36:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
dxml 0.2.0 has now been released.
I really wasn't planning on releasing anything this quickly
after announcing dxml, but when I went to start working on DOM
support, it turned out to be surprisingly quick and easy to
On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 04:30:38 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Sunday, 11 February 2018 at 15:18:20 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
On the other hand, if my bank shoots itself in the foot it's
with my money... We must definitely have ways to do it but it
must be explicit and restricted to where
dxml 0.2.0 has now been released.
I really wasn't planning on releasing anything this quickly after announcing
dxml, but when I went to start working on DOM support, it turned out to be
surprisingly quick and easy to implement. So, dxml now has basic DOM
support.
As part of that, it became clear
On Sunday, 11 February 2018 at 15:11:55 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 February 2018 at 20:30:54 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
Other languages like Rust or C# (or Java) have bounds check.
Plus we probably lose it in release mode, which is the mode
where lurking bugs are discovered
On Sunday, 11 February 2018 at 15:11:55 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 February 2018 at 20:30:54 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
Other languages like Rust or C# (or Java) have bounds check.
Plus we probably lose it in release mode, which is the mode
where lurking bugs are discovered
On Wednesday, 7 February 2018 at 20:30:54 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
Other languages like Rust or C# (or Java) have bounds check.
Plus we probably lose it in release mode, which is the mode
where lurking bugs are discovered usually days after
development ;) Some of these languages would
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 21:15:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[...]
Of note, dxml does not support the DTD section beyond what is
required to parse past it
[...]
- Jonathan M Davis
Fun fact, since the most common security vulnerability associated
with XML (XEE [1]) is based on
On 11/02/2018 1:13 PM, Dukc wrote:
Out of interest will each! work here as well?
in the form:
import std.algorithm, std.range;
iota(5, 15).map!(x => x*2).each!(num => printf("%d ", num));
...it does.
:)
On Sunday, 11 February 2018 at 12:56:34 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
And it worked just as in desktop, meaning that one can do
pipeline programming in the internet using D! Or in any
enviroment where D can compile to, D runtime or no.
Well, I just remembered that the Emscripten compiler did
On 11/02/2018 12:51 PM, Dukc wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 February 2018 at 13:29:04 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Walter's got a new post up! It's the first in a new series on the
benefits of BetterC mode. In this one, he talks about solving the
fencepost problem (off-by-one errors) with D's arrays.
I
On Wednesday, 7 February 2018 at 13:29:04 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Walter's got a new post up! It's the first in a new series on
the benefits of BetterC mode. In this one, he talks about
solving the fencepost problem (off-by-one errors) with D's
arrays.
I think that at some point it should
On 2018-02-10 19:57, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Kind of. I did some benchmarking to see if some code changes would improve
performance, but I haven't tried benchmarking it against any other XML
libraries.
Ok, I see.
That would take a fair bit of time and effort, and IMHO, that
would be better
On Sun, 2018-02-11 at 03:34 -0700, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
>
[…]
> Given how strings work in D, parsing is something that we should
> easily be
> able to do faster than other languages - or at least, other languages
> typically have to write much less idiomatic code
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 09:35:38 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo
wrote:
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 08:32:14 UTC, JN wrote:
Can you explain how the EPL license works? I am not familiar
with that license. Is DWT and anything using it considered a
derivative work off Eclipse? Do I need to share
On Sunday, February 11, 2018 10:11:05 Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 13:47 -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-
>
> announce wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:15:33PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > > I have
On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 13:47 -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:15:33PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > I have multiple projects that need an XML parser, and
> > std_experimental_xml is clearly going nowhere, with the
Support for D was added in the recent days. More information
about camisole https://camisole.prologin.org/
17 matches
Mail list logo
