On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 22:37:21 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce LDC 1.8. The
highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.078.3.
* New switch `-link-defaultlib-shared` to link against shared
druntime/Phobos.
* Plugins support,
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce LDC 1.8. The
highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.078.3.
* New switch `-link-defaultlib-shared` to link against shared
druntime/Phobos.
* Plugins support, compatible with existing Clang plugins.
* Support for
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 18:52:36 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
What about trying to start an own "D Exchange"? I like the
possibility to vote for good questions and answers. There are
many gems inside the forum, but not so easy to find as in the
stack exchange based forums.
That
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 18:52:36 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 17:26:50 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 15:13:28 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
But seriously, Stack overflow is a reputation-based system,
it very hostile from the very start, when you don't have
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 17:26:50 UTC, bauss wrote:
It's also very strict and probably have of the posts within
Learn here wouldn't be allowed there.
It's the most hilarious aspect. Apparently questions about design
don't belong there. As if the moderators don't even know about
the
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 12:01:33 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
So having D2.999 is fine per se, but advertises a lack of
change and a lack of ambition since the language name is D not
D2.
D just doesn't follow semver. If it did, we would have D79 now,
nothing else even comes close to this.
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 17:26:50 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 15:13:28 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
But seriously, Stack overflow is a reputation-based system, it
very hostile from the very start, when you don't have enough
reputation for pretty much everything, and SO vehemently
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 15:13:28 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
But seriously, Stack overflow is a reputation-based system, it
very hostile from the very start, when you don't have enough
reputation for pretty much everything, and SO vehemently nags
you about this on every possible occasion, even
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 17:26:50 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 15:13:28 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
But seriously, Stack overflow is a reputation-based system, it
very hostile from the very start, when you don't have enough
reputation for pretty much everything, and SO vehemently
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 15:13:28 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
But seriously, Stack overflow is a reputation-based system, it
very hostile from the very start [...]
Very true.
But seriously, Stack overflow is a reputation-based system, it
very hostile from the very start, when you don't have enough
reputation for pretty much everything, and SO vehemently nags you
about this on every possible occasion, even baiting you to use
functionality only to later tell that you
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 13:41:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://seb134.typeform.com/to/H1GTak
I might have overseen it, but in the survey I missed the feature
"being able to allocate withing @nogc-CTFE-functions". Some
people want to promote a @nogc library and they cant use
12 matches
Mail list logo
