On Tuesday, 26 November 2019 at 04:22:49 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
Hunt Cache is a D language cache framework that supports
L2cache, and now supports Redis, Memcache, Memory, RocksDB. at
the back of the cache.
Code for DLang:
https://code.dlang.org/packages/hunt-cache
Reposiroty for Github:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2019 at 12:27:52 UTC, user wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 02:16:28 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
```
apk --no-cache add -X
http://dl-cdn.alpinelinux.org/alpine/edge/testing ldc
ldc-static dtools-rdmd dub
```
A hello world vibe project doesn't build for me using
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 23:46:31 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Oooh very nice!! That's wonderful to hear. So you're saying
LDC out-of-the-box can cross-compile from Linux to Windows
directly? How to do this? I'm *very* interested!
ldc2 -mtriple=x86_64-pc-windows-msvc
though you will
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 09:51:31PM +, kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 18:28:55 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > - lack of support for cross-compilation (e.g., cross-compile to
> > Android from a Linux x86 host, or cross-compile from Linux host to
> >
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 19:48:46 UTC, GreatSam4sure wrote:
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 18:28:55 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:15:42PM +, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...]
[...]
I'm probably not the intended audience here, but
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 18:28:55 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
- lack of support for cross-compilation (e.g., cross-compile to
Android
from a Linux x86 host, or cross-compile from Linux host to
Windows
executable via wine / cygwin).
You're not up to speed, this has been solved with
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 07:48:46PM +, GreatSam4sure via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
> I am interested in D/java project. Can you help me with material or
> link on that. I Will be happy to use javafx as front end and D as back
> end for a desktop App.
>
> I have looking on GraalVm
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 10:16:47 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
On Sunday, 24 November 2019 at 16:34:35 UTC, Dgame wrote:
Maybe some of you know Dgame (https://github.com/Dgame/Dgame),
it was my biggest project using D and was a lot of fun at that
time. But since I don't use D anymore, I have
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 18:28:55 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:15:42PM +, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...]
[...]
I'm probably not the intended audience here, but just so it's
out there, here's a list of dub showstoppers for me:
On Saturday, 23 November 2019 at 09:51:13 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
This is my proposal for porting D runtime to WebAssembly. I
would like to ask you to review it. You can find it here:
https://gist.github.com/skoppe/7617ceba6afd67b2e20c6be4f922725d
On the GC part. It says "The only
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:15:42PM +, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
> What's currently broken or impossible in DUB?
I'm probably not the intended audience here, but just so it's out there,
here's a list of dub showstoppers for me:
- lack of support for
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 13:14:09 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
The biggest thing for me would be incremental compilation. As
well as a dub build and test 'watch' mode to avoid scanning the
dependencies every time.
I think there are two levels to incremental compilation (IC).
1. File
On 11/25/19 7:52 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
So it became clear to me I need to have druntime available. It will
allow people to use the (almost) complete set of D features and it opens
up some metaprogramming avenues that are closed off right now. With that
I will be able to create some nice
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 13:52:29 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
You don't have to wait for that. That future is already here.
The in and output could also be distributed storage, event
streams or some queue.
Yes, I am most familiar with Google Cloud. Earlier this year
Google Functions
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 13:00:23 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Yes, definitely. But what do you mean with improved support?
Like better pattern matching over either types?
Yes, that sort of thing. And maybe a move towards trying to use
this kind of error handling in newer editions of
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 13:28:17 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 12:52:46 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
As an example, it is just a matter of time before a PaaS
provider fully embraces wasm.
This sounds interesting, I've been pondering about serverless
On Saturday, 23 November 2019 at 23:21:49 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 11/23/19 3:48 PM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Saturday, 23 November 2019 at 15:23:41 UTC, Alexandru
Ermicioi wrote:
I was wondering whats your position on Fibers?
I am not going to support them in this
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 12:52:46 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
As an example, it is just a matter of time before a PaaS
provider fully embraces wasm.
This sounds interesting, I've been pondering about serverless
FaaS (function as a service), where you basically (hopefully) get
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 12:15:42 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
What's currently broken or impossible in DUB? What parts of
that can be fixed without changing the config or CLI? And what
improvements are most efficiently made via breaking changes?
Please, let's bring our focus
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 12:19:30 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Saturday, 23 November 2019 at 09:51:13 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
This is my proposal for porting D runtime to WebAssembly. I
would like to ask you to review it. You can find it here:
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 09:01:15 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Saturday, 23 November 2019 at 09:51:13 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
This is my proposal for porting D runtime to WebAssembly. I
would like to ask you to review it. You can find it here:
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 11:59:11 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Is there any chance you can be convinced to join our force to
improve Dub?
A lot of developers invested their time to either improve Dub
in general
or to get their needed scenarios running.
My gut feeling is, it would take years
On Saturday, 23 November 2019 at 09:51:13 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
This is my proposal for porting D runtime to WebAssembly. I
would like to ask you to review it. You can find it here:
https://gist.github.com/skoppe/7617ceba6afd67b2e20c6be4f922725d
Thanks for putting this together, it
On Monday, 11 November 2019 at 13:44:28 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
So dub has some problems, and personally I find its code base
very hard to get
into.
At Symmetry we are a very heavy user of dub, resulting in many
wasted hours.
So I started to write dud [1]. I kept some boring/nice parts
On Sunday, 24 November 2019 at 16:34:35 UTC, Dgame wrote:
Maybe some of you know Dgame (https://github.com/Dgame/Dgame),
it was my biggest project using D and was a lot of fun at that
time. But since I don't use D anymore, I have neither the time
nor the desire and even less the knowledge to
Regarding dependency resolution:
Did anybody here had a look at what the Dart people are
doing with pubgrab?
https://github.com/dart-lang/pub/blob/master/doc/solver.md
https://medium.com/@nex3/pubgrub-2fb6470504f
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fifni75xYeQ
Especially the error reporting looks
On Saturday, 23 November 2019 at 09:51:13 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
This is my proposal for porting D runtime to WebAssembly. I
would like to ask you to review it. You can find it here:
https://gist.github.com/skoppe/7617ceba6afd67b2e20c6be4f922725d
This proposal is so perfectly balanced
On Sunday, 24 November 2019 at 20:42:24 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
LLVM errors out saying it can't select tls for wasm. We could
modify ldc to not emit TLS instructions under WebAssembly.
No need do make that rule WASM-specific. Do this for all programs
that have thearding disabled.
28 matches
Mail list logo
