Re: Contacting DlangScience maintainers

2021-03-30 Thread rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-announce

On 31/03/2021 7:28 AM, Chris Piker wrote:
Since I'm not orphaning packages soon and since physical science 
packages have a relatively small user base, it sounds like interaction 
with the dlang-community group is not recommended at this time.


It is neither not recommended, nor recommended.

Get something solid that people want to use, then it doesn't matter 
about how many people are available to maintain it.


Dlang-Community exists primarily as a backup in case of the original 
owners disappear (doesn't matter why, could just by life and only be 
gone for a year or two).


See: https://github.com/dlang-community/discussions


Re: Contacting DlangScience maintainers

2021-03-30 Thread Chris Piker via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Tuesday, 30 March 2021 at 17:40:15 UTC, mw wrote:

On Tuesday, 30 March 2021 at 07:51:17 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
https://github.com/dlang-community/discussions/issues

But there is not much going on in DlangScience, right now there 
is no real package maintained. The dlang-community intention is 
to maintain *orphaned* but useful packages.


Good to know you're out there providing continuity.

Since I'm not orphaning packages soon and since physical science 
packages have a relatively small user base, it sounds like 
interaction with the dlang-community group is not recommended at 
this time.


E.g. one of the most popular package libmir is not in 
DlangScience at all:


https://github.com/libmir/mir-algorithm
https://github.com/libmir


Good point. Though as a D core library I wouldn't expect it find 
it among a run-of-the-mill science repository collection.


So https://code.dlang.org/ is the main place for packages, 
science or not.


Okay, got it. Repositories are scattered, and that's okay, 
because packages are centralized.




Re: Contacting DlangScience maintainers

2021-03-30 Thread mw via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Tuesday, 30 March 2021 at 07:51:17 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
Other than rudely posting an issue @ 
https://github.com/DlangScience/NetCDF-D, does anyone know the 
right way to start a conversation with DlangScience?  I'm 
trying to blend in and learn this community's norms.


try also:

https://github.com/dlang-community/discussions/issues

But there is not much going on in DlangScience, right now there 
is no real package maintained. The dlang-community intention is 
to maintain *orphaned* but useful packages.


E.g. one of the most popular package libmir is not in 
DlangScience at all:


https://github.com/libmir/mir-algorithm
https://github.com/libmir


So https://code.dlang.org/ is the main place for packages, 
science or not.




Re: Contacting DlangScience maintainers

2021-03-30 Thread Chris Piker via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Tuesday, 30 March 2021 at 04:34:48 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
As far as I know its not actively used. Both teams and the 
discussion feature Github offers them.


And yes I did try to make it public, that wasn't an option.


Hi Rikki

Thank you for trying to make it public, it's appreciated.

--
Chris



Re: Contacting DlangScience maintainers

2021-03-30 Thread Chris Piker via Digitalmars-d-announce

On Tuesday, 30 March 2021 at 02:55:27 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
"A visible team can be seen and @mentioned by every member of 
this organization."


Does this [hiding to non org members] really help D's 
visibility and adoption? What sorts of things are discussed 
that do not benefit from openness? For example, I am a bona 
fide scientist using Dlang, but had no idea dlang-science was 
even an active group (I was aware of the org, and repos, but 
assumed it was not very active)


Hi James

I'll second your sentiment.  I'm a mission support programmer on 
various space missions and would like to see what's discussed in 
dlang-science.  It appears that D has a lot to offer programmers 
in my field.  Like everyone else our data volumes are insane (ex: 
2.4 TB for a 6 hour ground radio astronomy observation).  D's 
performance combined with it's garbage collector are valuable in 
my line of work since everyone's python/matlab/idl code is 
grinding to a relative halt.


I could switch to Java and JNI since it would mesh well with 
other tools we support, but for now I'm trying out D, and would 
like to stay and gain competence in this elegant language.


Other than rudely posting an issue @ 
https://github.com/DlangScience/NetCDF-D, does anyone know the 
right way to start a conversation with DlangScience?  I'm trying 
to blend in and learn this community's norms.


--
Chris