On 9/16/21 4:56 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
> This was Razvan Nitu's baby from conception to implementation
Thank you, Razvan! Great job and a great article.
What I missed in the article is whether we are going to reward all
contributors or whether certain people like Walter are excused? :)
On Thursday, 16 September 2021 at 14:35:08 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
In my experience, the only severity settings most people
actually use when filing issues on Bugzilla are "enhancement",
"normal", and "regression". And when people do use the other
settings, there's no consistency to how
On Thursday, 16 September 2021 at 11:56:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
In my summary of last month's D Language Foundation meeting, I
mentioned that we discussed a system intended to reward
contributors who contribute pull requests that fix Bugzilla
issues. This was Razvan Nitu's baby from
On Thursday, 16 September 2021 at 11:56:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
...
We'll revise and adapt the system as needed as time goes by. In
the meantime, happy bug fixing!
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/09/16/bugzilla-reward-system/
...
Nice idea to reward contributors. Happy to see that
On Thursday, 16 September 2021 at 11:56:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/09/16/bugzilla-reward-system/
From the post:
The scoring is designed to reward contributors based on the
importance of the issues they fix, rather than the total number
fixed. As such, issues are
On 16.09.21 13:56, Mike Parker wrote:
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/09/16/bugzilla-reward-system/
From there:
Rule #2: A PR fixing a bug may not be merged by the same person that proposed
the patch.
This is already an unwritten rule that applies to the DLang repositories, so it
In my summary of last month's D Language Foundation meeting, I
mentioned that we discussed a system intended to reward
contributors who contribute pull requests that fix Bugzilla
issues. This was Razvan Nitu's baby from conception to
implementation, and we all think it is a great idea.
The
