Re: D Language Foundation Monthly Meeting for February 2022
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 14:03:38 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 12:39:39 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote: On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 01:21:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: But we have no reason to move the D projects away from GitHub to GitLab. GitLab has never entered the conversation. Two reasons would be that 1) It already offers [an integration with bugzilla](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/integrations/bugzilla.html). 2) Being open source it can be installed on your own hardware, which is the main argument being made for using bugzilla. It also has integrated CI. — Bastiaan. I have no opinion on point #1, but for #2, I do not see that as a benefit. We're aiming to integrate all of our services. As I see it, the less we have to manage ourselves, the better. If we did for some reason want to migrate to GitLab, my vote would be to let them host us. But my point was, GitHub has worked well for us for years. There's no desire to move away that I'm aware of. If it ain't broke, don't fix it! I agree, I personally only use Github, so for me it's preferable that D stays on Github.
Re: D Language Foundation Monthly Meeting for February 2022
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 14:03:38 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 12:39:39 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote: On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 01:21:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: But we have no reason to move the D projects away from GitHub to GitLab. GitLab has never entered the conversation. Two reasons would be that 1) It already offers [an integration with bugzilla](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/integrations/bugzilla.html). 2) Being open source it can be installed on your own hardware, which is the main argument being made for using bugzilla. It also has integrated CI. — Bastiaan. I have no opinion on point #1, but for #2, I do not see that as a benefit. We're aiming to integrate all of our services. As I see it, the less we have to manage ourselves, the better. If we did for some reason want to migrate to GitLab, my vote would be to let them host us. But my point was, GitHub has worked well for us for years. There's no desire to move away that I'm aware of. If it ain't broke, don't fix it! Definitely. Personally I think moving the tickets to GitHub is a good idea, I just felt these points needed to be made for completeness. — Bastiaan.
Re: D Language Foundation Monthly Meeting for February 2022
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 12:39:39 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote: On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 01:21:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: But we have no reason to move the D projects away from GitHub to GitLab. GitLab has never entered the conversation. Two reasons would be that 1) It already offers [an integration with bugzilla](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/integrations/bugzilla.html). 2) Being open source it can be installed on your own hardware, which is the main argument being made for using bugzilla. It also has integrated CI. — Bastiaan. I have no opinion on point #1, but for #2, I do not see that as a benefit. We're aiming to integrate all of our services. As I see it, the less we have to manage ourselves, the better. If we did for some reason want to migrate to GitLab, my vote would be to let them host us. But my point was, GitHub has worked well for us for years. There's no desire to move away that I'm aware of. If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
Re: D Language Foundation Monthly Meeting for February 2022
On Saturday, 5 March 2022 at 01:21:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: But we have no reason to move the D projects away from GitHub to GitLab. GitLab has never entered the conversation. Two reasons would be that 1) It already offers [an integration with bugzilla](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/integrations/bugzilla.html). 2) Being open source it can be installed on your own hardware, which is the main argument being made for using bugzilla. It also has integrated CI. — Bastiaan.
